ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Testing the reachability of (new) address space
Full text PdfPdf (153 KB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the 2007 SIGCOMM workshop on Internet network management table of contents
Kyoto, Japan
SESSION: Operations support table of contents
Pages: 236 - 241  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-788-9
Authors
Randy Bush  IIJ
James Hiebert  University of Oregon
Olaf Maennel  University of Adelaide
Matthew Roughan  University of Adelaide
Steve Uhlig  TU Delft
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1321753.1321756
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Internet was originally designed to provide connectivity from every node to every other node. However, policies can impede this connectivity [1]. This is especially true for newly allocated address space. Some Internet Service Providers (ISPs) simply do not realize that the status of previously unallocated address space has changed, and they continue blocking that space. Therefore, it would be desirable to test whether filters block newly apportioned address space before it is allocated to ISPs and/or end users.

In this paper we present a methodology that aims to detect incorrectly configured filters, so that ISPs can be contacted and asked to update their router configurations. Our methodology is capable of detecting paths on which reachability is actually present but which are routed around an outdated filter configuration, as well as cases where a destination is inaccessible. To help narrowing down the most likely ASs that actually filter, we introduce a filtering likelihood index.

We apply our methodology on newly allocated address space and perform initial experiments on a large fraction of ISPs, covering over 80% of all Autonomous Systems (ASs).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
C. Labovitz and A. Ahuja, "Shining Light on Dark Internet Address Space," NANOG 23, 2001.
 
2
 
3
P. Boothe, J. Hiebert, and R. Bush, "How Prevalent is Prefix Hijacking on the Internet?," NANOG 36, February 2006.
 
4
5
 
6
"The Team Cymru Bogon Reference Page." http://www.cymru.com/Bogons/.
7
 
8
G. Huston, "IPv4 Address Report," 2007. http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/index.html.
9
 
10
American Registry for Internet Numbers. http://www.arin.net/.
 
11
"Planetlab." http://www.planet-lab.org/.
12
 
13
North American Network Operators Group. http://nanog.org/.
14
15
 
16
Cooperative Association for Data Analysis, "Skitter." http://www.caida.org/tools/measurement/skitter/.
 
17
Z. Mao, D. Johnson, J. Rexford, J. Wang, and R. Katz, "Scalable and accurate identification of AS-level forwarding paths," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2004.
 
18
R. Bush, T. Griffin, Z. M. Mao, E. Purpus, and D. Stutzbach, "Happy Packets - Initial Results," 2004. NANOG 31.
 
19
 
20
T. G. Griffin Interdomain routing links. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/tgg22/interdomain/.
 
21
22
 
23
T. G. Griffin and G. Huston, "BGP Wedgies," 2005. RFC 4264.
 
24
25
 
26
RIPE's Routing Information Service. http://www.ripe.net/ris/.
 
27
University of Oregon RouteViews project. http://www.routeviews.org/.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Randy Bush: colleagues
James Hiebert: colleagues
Olaf Maennel: colleagues
Matthew Roughan: colleagues
Steve Uhlig: colleagues