ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Computing explanations for unlively queries in databases
Full text PdfPdf (349 KB)
Source
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management table of contents
Lisbon, Portugal
POSTER SESSION: Poster session table of contents
Pages 955-958  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-803-9
Authors
Guillem Rull  Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Carles Farré  Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Ernest Teniente  Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Toni Urpí  Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1321440.1321584
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A query is unlively if it always returns an empty answer. Debugging a database schema requires not only determining unlively queries, but also fixing them. To the best of our knowledge, the existing methods do not provide the designer with an explanation of why a query is not lively. In this paper, we propose a method for computing explanations that is independent of the particular method used to determine liveliness. It provides three levels of search: one explanation, a maximal set of non-overlapping explanations, and all explanations. The first two levels require only a linear number of calls to the underlying method. We also propose a filter to reduce the number of these calls, and experimentally compare our method with the best known method for finding unsatisfiable subsets of constraints.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
James Bailey, Peter J. Stuckey: Discovery of Minimal Unsatisfiable Subsets of Constraints Using Hitting Set Dualization. Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages (PADL) 2005: 174--186.
 
2
 
3
4
 
5
The Mondial database http://www.dbis.informatik.uni-goettingen.de/Mondial/.
 
6
Stefan Schlobach, Ronald Cornet: Non-Standard Reasoning Services for the Debugging of Description Logic Terminologies. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) 2003: 355--362.
 
7


Collaborative Colleagues:
Guillem Rull: colleagues
Carles Farré: colleagues
Ernest Teniente: colleagues
Toni Urpí: colleagues