ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Reasoning about vague topological information
Full text PdfPdf (312 KB)
Source
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management table of contents
Lisbon, Portugal
SESSION: Data exploration and discovery (KM) table of contents
Pages 593-602  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-803-9
Authors
Steven Schockaert  Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
Martine De Cock  Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 57,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1321440.1321524
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Topological information plays a fundamental role in the human perception of spatial configurations and is thereby one of the most prominent geographical features in natural language. As vagueness abounds in geography, flexible formalisms with the ability to capture vague topological information are often needed in practice. While such formalisms have already been introduced by various authors, complete reasoning procedures are usually not discussed. In this paper, we show how many interesting reasoning tasks, such as consistency checking and entailment checking, can be supported in a generalization of the well-known RCC-8 calculus. In particular, we present decision procedures based on linear programming, solving all reasoning tasks of interest. We furthermore show how deciding the consistency of vague topological information can be reduced to the consistency problem of the original RCC-8.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
E. Clementini and P. Di Felice. Approximate topological relations. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 16(2):173--204, 1997.
 
2
A. Cohn, J. Gooday, and B. Bennett. A comparison of structures in spatial and temporal logics. In Proceedings of the 16th International Wittgenstein Symposium, 1994.
 
3
A. Cohn and N. Gotts. The 'egg-yolk' representation of regions with indeterminate boundaries. In Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries (P.A. Burrough and A.U. Frank, eds.), pages 171--187. Taylor and Francis Ltd., 1996.
 
4
 
5
M. Egenhofer and R. Franzosa. Point-set topological spatial relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5(2):161--174, 1991.
 
6
A. Esterline, G. Dozier, and A. Homaifar. Fuzzy spatial reasoning. In Proceedings of the 1997 International Fuzzy Systems Association Conference, pages 162--167, 1997.
 
7
 
8
A. Gerevini and J. Renz. Combining topological and size information for spatial reasoning.
 
9
F. Gey, R. Larson, M. Sanderson, K. Bischoff, T. Mandl, C. Womser-Hacker, D. Santos, and P. Rocha. GeoCLEF 2006: the CLEF 2006 cross-language geographic information retrieval track overview. In Working Notes for the CLEF 2006 Workshop, 2006.
 
10
M. Grigni, D. Papadias, and C. Papadimitriou. Topological inference. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 901--906, 1995.
 
11
 
12
P. Jonsson and C. Bäckström. A linear-programming approach to temporal reasoning. In Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1235--1240, 1996.
 
13
 
14
 
15
S. Li. Combining topological and directional information for spatial reasoning. In Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 435--440, 2007.
 
16
Y. Li and S. Li. A fuzzy sets theoretic approach to approximate spatial reasoning. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 12(6):745--754, 2004.
 
17
Y. Li and S. Li. Computing the fuzzy topological relations of spatial objects based on induced fuzzy topology. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(8):857--883, 2006.
 
18
 
19
D. Randell, Z. Cui, and A. Cohn. A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 165--176, 1992.
 
20
 
21
J. Renz. A canonical model of the Region Connection Calculus. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 12(3-4):469--494, 2002.
 
22
 
23
J. Renz and B. Nebel. Efficient methods for qualitative spatial reasoning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 15:289--318, 2001.
 
24
 
25
A. Roy and J. Stell. Spatial relations between indeterminate regions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 27(3):205--234, 2001.
 
26
 
27
S. Schockaert, C. Cornelis, M. De Cock, and E. Kerre. Fuzzy spatial relations between vague regions. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Conference on Intelligent Systems, pages 221--226, 2006.
 
28
U. Straccia. Reasoning within fuzzy description logics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4:137--166, 2001.
 
29
X. Tang and W. Kainz. Analysis of topological relations between fuzzy regions in a general fuzzy topological space. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Geospatial Theory, Processing and Applications, 2002.
 
30
L. Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3):338--353, 1965.
 
31
F. Zhan. Approximate analysis of binary topological relations between geographic regions with indeterminate boundaries. Soft Computing, 2(2):28--34, 1998.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Steven Schockaert: colleagues
Martine De Cock: colleagues