ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Semantic verification in an online fact seeking environment
Full text PdfPdf (294 KB)
Source
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management table of contents
Lisbon, Portugal
SESSION: Natural language I (IR) table of contents
Pages: 71-78  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-803-9
Authors
Dmitri Roussinov  Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Ozgur Turetken  Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 44,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1321440.1321453
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many artificial intelligence tasks, such as automated question answering, reasoning or heterogeneous database integration, involve verification of a semantic category (e.g. "coffee" is a drink, "red" is a color, while "steak" is not a drink and "big" is not a color). We present a novel algorithm to automatically validate a semantic category. Contrary to the methods suggested earlier, our approach does not rely on any manually codified knowledge but instead capitalizes on the diversity of topics and word usage on the World Wide Web. We have tested our approach within our online fact-seeking (question answering) environment. When tested on the TREC questions that expect the answer to belong to a specific semantic category, our approach has improved the accuracy by up to 14% depending on the model and metrics used.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Boris Katz, Jimmy Lin, Daniel Loreto, Wesley Hildebrandt, Matthew Bilotti, Sue Felshin, Aaron Fernandes, Gregory Marton, and Federico Mora. Integrating Web-based and Corpus-based Techniques for Question Answering. (2003). Proceedings of the Twelfth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2003), November 2003, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
 
3
 
4
Brill, E., Dumais, S. and Banko, M., An Analysis of the AskMSR Question-Answering System, Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Philadelphia, PA, USA, July 6-7.
 
5
Downey, Oren Etzioni, and Stephen Soderland (2005). A Probabilistic Model of Redundancy in Information Extraction. IJCAI-05.
6
 
7
E. Agirre, O. Ansa, E. Hovy, and D. Martinez. Enriching very large ontologies using the WWW. In Proceedings of the ECAI Ontology Learning Workshop, 2000.
 
8
 
9
 
10
Harabagiu, S., Moldovan, D., Pasca, M., Mihalcea, R., Surdeanu, M., Bunescu, R., Girju, R., Rus, V., and Morarescu, P. (2000). Falcon: Boosting knowledge for answer engines. In NIST Special Publication 500-249: The Ninth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 9), pages 479--488, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 13-16.
 
11
K. Ahmad, M. Tariq, B. Vrusias, and C. Handy. Corpus-based thesaurus construction for image retrieval in specialist domains. In Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR), pages 502--510, 2003.
 
12
K. Markert, N. Modjeska, and M. Nissim. Using the web for nominal anaphora resolution. In EACL Workshop on the Computational Treatment of Anaphora, 2003.
 
13
Katz, B. (1997). From Sentence Processing to Information Access on the World Wide Web. In Natural Language Processing for the World Wide Web: Papers from the 1997 AAAI Spring Symposium, pages 77--94, 1997.
14
15
 
16
M. Poesio, T. Ishikawa, S. Schulte im Walde, and R. Viera. Acquiring lexical knowledge for anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 2002.
 
17
18
19
 
20
21
 
22
 
23
Ravichandran, D., and Hovy, E. (2002). Learning surface text patterns for a question answering system. In Proceedings of ACL, 2002.
 
24
Roussinov, D., Chau., M., Filatova, E., Robles, J., Building on Redundancy: Factoid Question Answering, Robust Retrieval and the "Other". In proceedings of TREC 2005, Nov. 15-18, 2005.
 
25
Schlobach, S., Olsthoorn, M., and de Rijke, M. (2004). Type Checking in Open-Domain Question Answering (Extended Abstract), In: R. Verbrugge, N. Taatgen, and L. Schomaker, editors, Proceedings BNAIC 2004, pages 367--368, 2004.
 
26
Soubbotin, M. and Soubbotin, S. (2002). Use of patterns for detection of likely answer strings: A systematic approach. Proceedings of the Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference TREC 2002. Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 19-22.
 
27
Voorhees, E. and Buckland, L. P., Eds. (2004). Proceedings of the Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference TREC 2004. Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 16-19.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Dmitri Roussinov: colleagues
Ozgur Turetken: colleagues