ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Using paper mockups for evaluating soft keyboard layouts
Full text PdfPdf (374 KB)
Source IBM Centre for Advanced Studies Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2007 conference of the center for advanced studies on Collaborative research table of contents
Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada
SESSION: Computer supported collaborative work and human computer interaction table of contents
Pages: 98 - 108  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:1705-7361
Authors
I. Scott MacKenzie  York University, Toronto Canada
Janet C. Read  University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
Sponsors
: IBM Toronto Software Lab
: IBM Centers for Advanced Studies (CAS)
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 106,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1321211.1321222
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Five experiments were conducted to compare soft keyboard layouts. The methodology involved paper mockups and manual timing in a classroom situation. Students worked in pairs - one as experimenter, one as participant - swapping roles midway through the experiment. Participants used a stylus to tap the well-known "quick brown fox" phrase five times on each layout. Entry speeds, computed from the measured time to enter the phrase, were 26.5 to 34.5 wpm for the Qwerty keyboard layout, 12.3 to 14.7 wpm for the Opti layout, 15.7 wpm for the Fitaly layout, 12.1 and 12.3 for a Qwerty-Phone (QP) hybrid layout, and 19.0 to 23.0 wpm for the standard phone keypad layout. The merits and limitations of the evaluation method are discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
4
 
5
Goldstein, M., Bretan, I., Sallnas, E.-L., and Bjork, H., Navigational abilities in audial voice-controlled dialogue structures, Behaviour & Information Technology, 18, 1999, 83--95.
6
 
7
Gopher, D. and Raij, D., Typing with a two-hand chord keyboard: Will the QWERTY become obsolete?, IEEE Transactions of Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18, 1988, 601--609.
 
8
9
10
11
 
12
Hughes, D., Warren, J., and Buyukkokten, O., Empirical bi-action tables: A tool for the evaluation and optimization of text input systems: Application I: Soft keyboards, Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 2002, 271--309.
13
14
15
16
 
17
Kroemer, K. H. E., Operation of ternary chorded keys, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 1993, 267--288.
 
18
Lewis, J. R., Kennedy, P. J., and LaLomia, M. J., Development of a digram-based typing key layout for single-finger/stylus input, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, (Santa Monica, CA: HFES, 1999), 415--419.
 
19
Lewis, J. R., LaLomia, M. J., and Kennedy, P. J., Evaluation of typing key layouts for stylus input, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, (Santa Monica, CA: HFES, 1999), 420--424.
 
20
Lewis, J. R., Potosnak, K. M., and Magyar, R. L., Keys and keyboards, in Handbook on human-computer interaction, (M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, and V. Prabhu, Eds.) Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997.
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
MacKenzie, I. S. and Soukoreff, R. W., Text entry for mobile computing: Models and methods, theory and practice, Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 2002, 147--198.
 
25
26
 
27
MacKenzie, I. S. and Zhang, S. X., An empirical investigation of the novice experience with soft keyboards, Behaviour & Information Technology, 20, 2001, 411--418.
 
28
MacKenzie, I. S., Zhang, S. X., and Soukoreff, R. W., Text entry using soft keyboards, Behaviour & Information Technology, 18, 1999, 235--244.
 
29
MacKenzie, I. S., Zhang, X. I., and Soukoreff, R. W., Stylus tapping on a soft keyboard, Behaviour & Information Technology, 18, 1998, 235--244.
30
31
 
32
 
33
Norman, D. A. and Fisher, E., Why alphabetic keyboards are not easy to use: Keyboard layout doesn't much matter, Human Factors, 24, 1982, 509--519.
 
34
35
36
37
 
38
Snyder, C., Paper prototyping: The fast and easy way to design and refine user interfaces: San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.
 
39
Soukoreff, W. and MacKenzie, I. S., Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing speeds using a stylus and soft keyboard, Behaviour & Information Technology, 14, 1995, 370--379.
 
40
Yamada, H., A historical study of typewriters and typing methods: From the position of planning Japanese parallels, Journal of Information Processing, 2, 1980, 175--202.
41
 
42
Zhai, S., Hunter, M., and Smith, B. A., Performance optimization of virtual keyboards, Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 2002, 229--269.
43


Collaborative Colleagues:
I. Scott MacKenzie: colleagues
Janet C. Read: colleagues