|
ABSTRACT
Routing protocols in sensor networks maintain information on neighbor states and potentially many other factors in order to make informed decisions. Challenges arise both in (a) performing accurate and adaptive information discovery and (b) processing/analyzing the gathered data to extract useful features and correlations. To address such challenges, this paper explores using supervised learning techniques to make informed decisions in the context of wireless sensor networks. We investigate the design space of both offline learning and online learning and use link quality estimation as a case study to evaluate their effectiveness. For this purpose, we present MetricMap, a metric-based collection routing protocol atop MintRoute that derives link quality using classifiers learned in the training phase, when the traditional ETX approach fails. The offline learning approach is evaluated on a 30-node sensor network testbed, and our results show that MetricMap can achieve up to 300% improvement over MintRoute in data delivery rate for high data rate situations, with no negative impact on other performance metrics. We also explore the possibility of using online learning in this paper.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
Douglas S. J. De Couto , Daniel Aguayo , John Bicket , Robert Morris, A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing, Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, September 14-19, 2003, San Diego, CA, USA
[doi> 10.1145/938985.939000]
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Hongwei Zhang, Anish Arora, and Prasun Sinha. Learn on the fly: Data-driven link estimation and routing in sensor network backbones. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2006.
|
| |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
Lakshman Krishnamurthy , Robert Adler , Phil Buonadonna , Jasmeet Chhabra , Mick Flanigan , Nandakishore Kushalnagar , Lama Nachman , Mark Yarvis, Design and deployment of industrial sensor networks: experiences from a semiconductor plant and the north sea, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 02-04, 2005, San Diego, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1098918.1098926]
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
S. Sandeep Pradhan, Julius Kusuma, and Kannan Ramchandran. Distributed compression in a dense microsensor network. IEEE Signal Processing, March 2002.
|
| |
10
|
Mistlab. http://mistlab.csail.mit.edu/.
|
| |
11
|
IEEE Standard 802, part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs). 2003.
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
Daniel Aguayo , John Bicket , Sanjit Biswas , Glenn Judd , Robert Morris, Link-level measurements from an 802.11b mesh network, Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, August 30-September 03, 2004, Portland, Oregon, USA
|
 |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
Chieh-Yih Wan , Shane B. Eisenman , Andrew T. Campbell , Jon Crowcroft, Siphon: overload traffic management using multi-radio virtual sinks in sensor networks, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 02-04, 2005, San Diego, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1098918.1098931]
|
| |
18
|
William W. Cohen. Fast effective rule induction. In Proc. the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 1995.
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
Raj Jain. The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis: Techniques for Experimental Design, Measurement, Simulation and Modeling. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1991.
|
| |
21
|
|
 |
22
|
|
 |
23
|
Omprakash Gnawali , Ki-Young Jang , Jeongyeup Paek , Marcos Vieira , Ramesh Govindan , Ben Greenstein , August Joki , Deborah Estrin , Eddie Kohler, The Tenet architecture for tiered sensor networks, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, October 31-November 03, 2006, Boulder, Colorado, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1182807.1182823]
|
 |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
VFML Toolkit, http://www.cs.washington.edu/dm/vfml/main.html.
|
 |
26
|
Nithya Ramanathan , Kevin Chang , Rahul Kapur , Lewis Girod , Eddie Kohler , Deborah Estrin, Sympathy for the sensor network debugger, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 02-04, 2005, San Diego, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1098918.1098946]
|
| |
27
|
Gilman Tolle and David Culler. Design of an application-cooperative management system for wireless sensor networks. In Proc. EWSN, 2005.
|
 |
28
|
Brad Calder , Dirk Grunwald , Michael Jones , Donald Lindsay , James Martin , Michael Mozer , Benjamin Zorn, Evidence-based static branch prediction using machine learning, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), v.19 n.1, p.188-222, Jan. 1997
[doi> 10.1145/239912.239923]
|
| |
29
|
Ira Cohen , Moises Goldszmidt , Terence Kelly , Julie Symons , Jeffrey S. Chase, Correlating instrumentation data to system states: a building block for automated diagnosis and control, Proceedings of the 6th conference on Symposium on Opearting Systems Design & Implementation, p.16-16, December 06-08, 2004, San Francisco, CA
|
| |
30
|
|
 |
31
|
Ben Liblit , Alex Aiken , Alice X. Zheng , Michael I. Jordan, Bug isolation via remote program sampling, Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2003 conference on Programming language design and implementation, June 09-11, 2003, San Diego, California, USA
|
| |
32
|
Justin A. Boyan and Michael L. Littman. Packet routing in dynamically changing networks: A reinforcement learning approach. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 6. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1994.
|
 |
33
|
|
 |
34
|
Carlos Guestrin , Peter Bodik , Romain Thibaux , Mark Paskin , Samuel Madden, Distributed regression: an efficient framework for modeling sensor network data, Proceedings of the third international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks, April 26-27, 2004, Berkeley, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/984622.984624]
|
 |
35
|
Andreas Krause , Carlos Guestrin , Anupam Gupta , Jon Kleinberg, Near-optimal sensor placements: maximizing information while minimizing communication cost, Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Information processing in sensor networks, April 19-21, 2006, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1127777.1127782]
|
 |
36
|
Joseph Polastre , Jonathan Hui , Philip Levis , Jerry Zhao , David Culler , Scott Shenker , Ion Stoica, A unifying link abstraction for wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 02-04, 2005, San Diego, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1098918.1098928]
|
| |
37
|
Can Emre Koksal and Hari Balakrishnan. Quality-aware routing metrics for time-varying wireless mesh networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas of Communication Special Issue on Multi-hop Wireless Mesh Networks, 24(11), November 2006.
|
| |
38
|
Alberto Cerpa , Jennifer L. Wong , Louane Kuang , Miodrag Potkonjak , Deborah Estrin, Statistical model of lossy links in wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks, April 24-27, 2005, Los Angeles, California
|
 |
39
|
Alberto Cerpa , Jennifer L. Wong , Miodrag Potkonjak , Deborah Estrin, Temporal properties of low power wireless links: modeling and implications on multi-hop routing, Proceedings of the 6th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing, May 25-27, 2005, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1062689.1062741]
|
| |
40
|
Hung X. Nguyen and Patrick Thiran. Using end-to-end data to infer lossy links in sensor networks. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2006.
|
| |
41
|
Qing Cao, Tian He, Lei Fang, Tarek Abdelzaher, John Stankovic, and Sang Son. Efficiency centric communication model for wireless sensor networks. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2006.
|
| |
42
|
Kannan Srinivasan, Prabal Dutta, Arsalan Tavakoli, and Philip Levis. Understanding the causes of packet delivery success and failure in dense wireless sensor networks. Technical Report SING-06-00, Stanford University, 2006.
|
|