Hard Disk Drives: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly!

ABSTRACT

HDDs (hard-disk drives) are like the bread in a peanut butter and jelly sandwich—sort of an unexciting piece of hardware necessary to hold the “software.” They are simply a means to an end. HDD reliability, however, has always been a significant weak link, perhaps the weak link, in data storage. In the late 1980s people recognized that HDD reliability was inadequate for large data storage systems so redundancy was added at the system level with some brilliant software algorithms, and RAID (redundant array of inexpensive disks) became a reality. RAID moved the reliability requirements from the HDD itself to the system of data disks. Commercial implementations of RAID range from n+1 configurations (mirroring) to the more common RAID-4 and RAID-5, and recently to RAID-6, the n+2 configuration that increases storage system reliability using two redundant disks (dual parity). Additionally, reliability at the RAID group level has been favorably enhanced because HDD reliability has been improving as well.

REFERENCES

• 1: Kanellos, M. 2007. Here comes the terabyte hard drive. CNET News, January 4. http://news.com/2100-1041_3-6147409.html.
• 2: Eduardo Pinheiro , Wolf-Dietrich Weber , Luiz André Barroso, Failure trends in a large disk drive population, Proceedings of the 5th USENIX conference on File and Storage Technologies, p.2-2, February 13-16, 2007, San Jose, CA
• 3: See reference 2.
• 4: Bianca Schroeder , Garth A. Gibson, Disk failures in the real world: what does an MTTF of 1,000,000 hours mean to you?, Proceedings of the 5th USENIX conference on File and Storage Technologies, p.1-es, February 13-16, 2007, San Jose, CA
• 5: Sun, F. Zhang, S. 2007. Does hard-disk drive failure rate enter steady-state after one year? Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, IEEE, January.
• 6: Shah, S., Elerath, J.G. 2004. Disk drive vintage and its effect on reliability. Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, January: 163--167.
• 7: Elerath, J.G. Shah, S. 2004. Server-class disk drives: How reliable are they? Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, January:151--156.
• 8: Jon G. Elerath , Michael Pecht, Enhanced Reliability Modeling of RAID Storage Systems, Proceedings of the 37th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, p.175-184, June 25-28, 2007 [doi>10.1109/DSN.2007.41]
• 9: Elerath, J.G. 2007. Reliability model and assessment of redundant arrays of inexpensive disks (RAID) incorporating latent defects and non-homogeneous Poisson process events. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland.
• 10: See reference 9.
• 11: Gray, J., van Ingen, C. 2005. Empirical measurements of disk failure rates and error rates. Microsoft Research Technical Report, MSR-TR-2005-166, December.
• 12: Schwarz, T.J.E., et al. 2004. Disk scrubbing in large archival storage systems. IEEE Computer Society Symposium: 1161--1170.
• 13: See reference 11.
• 14: See reference 9

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  B. Hardware
  B.3 MEMORY STRUCTURES
      B.3.2 Design Styles
          Subjects: Mass storage (e.g., magnetic, optical, RAID)

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.4 OPERATING SYSTEMS
      D.4.2 Storage Management
          Subjects: Secondary storage

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.8 PERSONAL COMPUTING
      K.8.3 Management/Maintenance

General Terms:
Management