ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A field study of community bar: (mis)-matches between theory and practice
Full text PdfPdf (438 KB)
Source
Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Awareness and co-presence table of contents
Pages 89-98  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-845-9
Authors
Natalia Romero  Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
Gregor McEwan  HxI Initiative & NICTA, Sydney, Australia
Saul Greenberg  University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 55,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1316624.1316638
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Community Bar (CB) is groupware supporting informal awareness and casual interaction. CB's design was derived from three sources: prior empirical research findings concerning informal awareness and casual interaction, a comprehensive sociological theory called the Locales Framework, and the Focus/Nimbus model of awareness. We conducted a field study of a group's on-going CB use. We use its results to reflect upon the matches and mis-matches that occurred between the theoretical and actual usage behaviors anticipated by our design principles vs. those observed in our deployment. As a critique, this reflectionis an important iterative step in recognizing flaws not just as usability problems, but as an incorrect translation of theory into design that can be re-analyzed from a theoretical perspective.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
Curtis, P. and Nichols, D. MUDs Grow Up: Social Virtual Reality in the Real World. Proc 39th IEEE COMPCON (1994), 193--200.
 
5
 
6
Greenberg, S., Fitzpatrick, G., Gutwin, C., and Kaplan, S. Adapting the Locales Framework for Heuristic Evaluation of Groupware. Australian J Information Systems, 7, 2 (2000).
 
7
Greenberg S. and Roseman, M. Using a Room Metaphor to Ease Transitions in Groupware. In M. Ackerman, V. Pipek, V. Wulf (Eds) Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management, 203--256, MIT Press. (2003)
8
 
9
10
 
11
McEwan, G., Greenberg, S., Rounding, M. and Boyle, M. Groupware Plug-ins: A Case Study of Extending Collaboration Functionality through Media Items. Proc CollabTech, IPSJ SIG (2006) 42--47.
12
13
 
14
Whittaker, S., Frolich, D., and Daly-Jones, O. Informal workplace communication: What is it like and how might we support it? Proc ACM CSCW (1994).131--138.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Natalia Romero: colleagues
Gregor McEwan: colleagues
Saul Greenberg: colleagues