ALOHA - a grading tool for semi-automatic assessment of mass programming courses

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

ALOHA - a grading tool for semi-automatic assessment of mass programming courses

Full text

Pdf (241 KB)

Source

Baltic Sea; Vol. 276 archive
Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea conference on Computing education research: Koli Calling 2006 table of contents

Uppsala, Sweden

POSTER SESSION: Demo/Poster papers table of contents

Pages: 139 - 140

Year of Publication: 2006

ISSN:1404-3203

Authors

Tuukka Ahoniemi	Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
Tommi Reinikainen	Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 47, Citation Count: 3

Additional Information:

abstract references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1315803.1315830 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many mass programming courses face the problems related to using multiple graders for student assignments: achieving objectivity and consistency in grading. Grading rubrics are a possible solution to this problem. ALOHA is an online grading tool that provides rubrics that all the graders have to use. ALOHA also provides features that make the grading process, including the writing of a feedback text, more convenient for the graders and the teacher.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Kirsti Ala-Mutka , Hannu-Matti Jarvinen, Assessment Process for Programming Assignments, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, p.181-185, August 30-September 01, 2004
	2	K. M. Ala-Mutka. A survey of automated assessment approaches for programming assignments. Computer Science Education, 15(2):83--102, June 2005.
	3	Katrin Becker, Grading programming assignments using rubrics, Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 30-July 02, 2003, Thessaloniki, Greece
	4	Mats Daniels , Anders Berglund , Arnold Pears , Sally Fincher, Five myths of assessment, Proceedings of the sixth conference on Australasian computing education, p.57-61, January 01, 2004, Dunedin, New Zealand
	5	S. Habeshaw, G. Gibbs, and T. Habeshaw. 53 Problems With Large Classes. Technical and Educational Services Ltd., Bristol, U.K., 1992.

CITED BY 3

	Tuukka Ahoniemi , Essi Lahtinen , Tommi Reinikainen, Improving pedagogical feedback and objective grading, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.40 n.1, March 2008
	Arnold Pears , Stephen Seidman , Lauri Malmi , Linda Mannila , Elizabeth Adams , Jens Bennedsen , Marie Devlin , James Paterson, A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.39 n.4, December 2007
	Tuukka Ahoniemi , Ville Karavirta, Analyzing the use of a rubric-based grading tool, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.41 n.3, September 2009