ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Hardware-rooted trust for secure key management and transient trust
Full text PdfPdf (521 KB)
Source
Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Key management table of contents
Pages: 389 - 400  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-703-2
Authors
Jeffrey S. Dwoskin  Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
Ruby B. Lee  Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 147,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1315245.1315294
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We propose minimalist new hardware additions to a microprocessor chip that protect cryptographic keys in portable computing devices which are used in the field but owned by a central authority. Our authority-mode architecture has trust rooted in two critical secrets: a Device Root Key and a Storage Root Hash, initialized in the device by the trusted authority. Our architecture protects trusted software, bound to the device, which can use the root secrets to protect other sensitive information for many different usage scenarios. We describe a detailed usage scenario for crisis response, where first responders are given transient access to third-party sensitive information which can be securely accessed during a crisis and reliably revoked after the crisis is over.

We leverage the Concealed Execution Mode of our earlier user-mode SP (Secret-Protecting) architecture to protect trusted code and its execution [1]. We call our new architecture authority-mode SP since it shares the same architectural lineage and the goal of minimalist hardware roots of trust. However, we completely change the key management hardware and software to enable new remote trust mechanisms that user-mode SP cannot support. In our new architecture, trust is built on top of the shared root key which binds together the secrets, policy and trusted software on the device. As a result, the authority-mode SP architecture can be used to provide significant new functionality including transient access to secrets with reliable revocation mechanisms, controlled transitive support for policy-controlled secrets belonging to different organizations, and remote attestation and secure communications with the authority.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
IETF Network Working Group. "Pre-Shared Key Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)," Request for Comments: 4279. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4279.txt
 
3
R. C. Merkle. "Protocols for public key cryptography," IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp.122--134, 1980.
 
4
Trusted Computing Group. "Trusted Platform Module (TPM) Specifications," April 2006. https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/specs/TPM
 
5
National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Advanced Encryption Standard," Federal Information Processing Standards Publication, FIPS Pub 197, Nov. 2001.
 
6
Intel, "LaGrande Technology Architectural Overview," http://www.intel.com/technology/security/, September 2003.
 
7
National Institute of Standards and Technology. "The Keyed-Hash Message Authentication Code (HMAC)," Federal Information Processing Standards Publication, FIPS Pub 198. http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips198/fips-198a.pdf
 
8
"ITU-T Recommendation X.509, The Directory: Authentication Framework", Int'l Telecomm. Union, Geneva, 2000; ISO/IEC 9594-8.
9
10
 
11
R. M. Best, "Preventing Software Piracy with Crypto-Microprocessors," Proc. of IEEE Spring COMPCON Š80, pp. 466--469, 1980.
 
12
T. Gilmont, J. D. Legat, and J. J. Quisquater "An Architecture of Security Management Unit for Safe Hosting of Multiple Agents," Proc. of the Int'l Workshop on Intelligent Communications and Multimedia Terminals, pp. 79--82, Nov 1998.
13
 
14
"SecureCore for Trustworthy Commodity Computing and Communications," collaborative project by Princeton University, Naval Postgraduate School and University of Southern California. Project home-page at http://palms.ee.princeton.edu/securecore/


Collaborative Colleagues:
Jeffrey S. Dwoskin: colleagues
Ruby B. Lee: colleagues