|
ABSTRACT
We give a unified account of classical secret-sharing goals from a modern cryptographic vantage. Our treatment encompasses perfect, statistical, and computational secret sharing; static and dynamic adversaries; schemes with or without robustness; schemes where a participant recovers the secret and those where an external party does so. We then show that Krawczyk's 1993 protocol for robust computational secret sharing (RCSS) need not be secure, even in the random-oracle model and for threshold schemes, if the encryption primitive it uses satisfies only one-query indistinguishability (ind1), the only notion Krawczyk defines. Nonetheless, we show that the protocol is secure (in the random-oracle model, for threshold schemes) if the encryption scheme also satisfies one-query key-unrecoverability (key1). Since practical encryption schemes are ind1+key1 secure, our result effectively shows that Krawczyk's RCSS protocol is sound (in the random-oracle model, for threshold schemes). Finally, we prove the security for a variant of Krawczyk's protocol, in the standard model and for arbitrary access structures, assuming ind1 encryption and a statistically-hiding, weakly-binding commitment scheme.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
P. Béguin and A. Cresti. General short computational secret sharing schemes. Eurocrypt '95.
|
| |
2
|
A. Beimel and B. Chor. Universally ideal secret sharing schemes. IEEE Trans. on Info. Theory, 40(3):786--794, 1994.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
M. Bellare and P. Rogaway. The security of triple encryption and a framework for code-based game-playing proofs. Eurocrypt '06.
|
| |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
M. Bellare and P. Rogaway. Robust computational secret sharing and a unified account of classical secret-sharing goals. Full version of this paper. Cryptology ePrint Report 2006/449, 2006.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
G. Blakley. Safeguarding cryptographic keys. AFIPS National Computer Conference, vol. 48, pp. 313--317, 1979.
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
R. Capocelli, A. DeSantis, L. Gargano, and U. Vaccaro. On the size of shares for secret sharing schemes. J. of Cryptology, 6:157--167, 1993.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
B. Chor, S. Goldwasser, S. Micali, and B. Awerbach. Verifiable secret sharing and achieving simultaneity in the presence of faults. FOCS '85.
|
| |
17
|
I. Damgård, T. Pedersen, and B. Pfitzmann. On the existence of statistically hiding bit commitment schemes and fail-stop signatures. J. of Cryptology, 10(3), pp. 163--194, 1997.
|
 |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
P. Feldman. A practical scheme for non-interactive verifiable secret sharing. FOCS '87.
|
| |
20
|
G. Ganger, P. Khosla, M. Bakkaloglu, M. Bigrigg, G. Goodson, S. Oguz, V. Pandurangan, C. Soules, J. Strunk, and J. Wylie. Survivable storage systems. DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition, vol. 2, IEEE Press, pp. 184--195, 2001.
|
| |
21
|
S. Goldwasser and S. Micali. Probabilistic encryption. JCSS, 28(2):270--299, 1984.
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
I. Haitner and O. Reingold. Statistically-hiding commitment from any one-way function. Cryptology ePrint report 2006/436, 2006.
|
| |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
Y. Ishai. Personal communication, February 2007.
|
| |
26
|
M. Ito, A. Saito, and T. Nishizeki. Secret sharing schemes realizing general access structure. IEEE Globecom 87, pp. 99--102, 1987.
|
| |
27
|
A. Iyengar, R. Cahn, C. Jutla, and J. Garay. Design and implementation of a secure distributed data repository. 14th IFIP International Information Security Conference, pp. 123--135, 1998.
|
| |
28
|
W. Jackson and K. Martin. Combinatorial models for perfect secret-sharing schemes. J. of Comb. Mathematics and Comb. Computing, vol. 28, pp. 249--265, 1998.
|
| |
29
|
E. Karnin, J. Greene, and M. Hellman. On secret sharing systems. IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory, 29(1):35--51, 1983.
|
| |
30
|
|
 |
31
|
|
| |
32
|
S. Lakshmanan, M. Ahamad, and H. Venkateswaran. Responsive security for stored data. IEEE Trans. on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 14(9):818--828, 2003.
|
| |
33
|
|
 |
34
|
|
| |
35
|
M. Naor, R. Ostrovsky, R. Venkatesan, and M. Yung. Perfect zero-knowledge arguments for NP using any one-way permutation. J. of Crypt. 11(2):87--108, 1998.
|
 |
36
|
|
| |
37
|
A. Paul, S. Adhikari, and U. Ramachandran. Design of a secure and fault tolerant environment for distributed storage. Tech. Report GIT-CERCS-04-02, Georgia Tech, 2004.
|
 |
38
|
|
 |
39
|
|
 |
40
|
|
 |
41
|
|
| |
42
|
C. Shannon. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, pp. 379--423 and pp. 623--656, July and October, 1948.
|
| |
43
|
|
| |
44
|
|
| |
45
|
V. Vinod, A. Narayanan, K. Srinathan, C. Rangan, and K. Kim. On the power of computational secret sharing. Indocrypt '03.
|
 |
46
|
|
| |
47
|
H. Witsenhausen. The zero-error side information problem and chromatic numbers. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 592--593, 1976.
|
| |
48
|
Jay J. Wylie , Michael W. Bigrigg , John D. Strunk , Gregory R. Ganger , Han Kiliççöte , Pradeep K. Khosla, Survivable Information Storage Systems, Computer, v.33 n.8, p.61-68, August 2000
[doi> 10.1109/2.863969]
|
|