ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A flexible security architecture to support third-party applications on mobile devices
Full text PdfPdf (615 KB)
Source
Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 2007 ACM workshop on Computer security architecture table of contents
Fairfax, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Technical paper session 1: hardware environments table of contents
Pages: 19 - 28  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-890-9
Authors
Lieven Desmet  Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Wouter Joosen  Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Fabio Massacci  Università di Trento, Trento, Italy
Katsiaryna Naliuka  Università di Trento, Trento, Italy
Pieter Philippaerts  Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Frank Piessens  Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Dries Vanoverberghe  Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 174,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1314466.1314470
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The problem of supporting the secure execution of potentially malicious third-party applications has received a considerable amount of attention in the past decade. In this paper we describe a security architecture for mobile devices that supports the flexible integration of a variety of advanced technologies for such secure execution of applications, including run-time monitoring, static verification and proof-carrying code. The architecture also supports the execution of legacy applications that have not been developed to take advantage of our architecture, though it can provide better performance and additional services for applications that are architecture-aware.The proposed architecture has been implemented on a Windows Mobile device with the .NET Compact Framework. It offers a substantial security benefit compared to the standard (state-of-practice) security architecture of such devices, even for legacy applications.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
I. Aktug and K. Naliuka. ConSpec -- a formal language for policy specification. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Run Time Enforcement for Mobile and Distributed Systems (REM2007), September 2007 (accepted).
2
 
3
N. Dragoni, F. Massacci, K. Naliuka, R. Sebastiani, I. Siahaan, T. Quillinan, I. Matteucci, and C. Schaefer. S3ms deliverable d2.1.4- methodologies and tools for contract matching, April 2007.
 
4
 
5
 
6
D. Evans and A. Twyman. Flexible policy-directed code safety. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 32--45, 1999.
7
 
8
R. Kazman, M. Klein, and P. Clements. Atam: Method for architecture evaluation. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2000-TR-004, CMU/SEI, August 2000.
 
9
F. Massacci and K. Naliuka. Multi-session security monitoring for mobile code. Technical Report DIT-06-067, UNITN, 2006.
 
10
MSDN. Windows mobile 5.0 application security. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms839681.aspx, May 2005.
11
12
 
13
B. Ray. Symbian signing is no protection from spyware. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/05/23/symbian_signed_spyware/, May 2007.
 
14
S3MS. Security of software and services for mobile systems. http://www.s3ms.org/, 2007.
15
 
16
R. Sekar, V. Venkatakrishnan, S. Basu, S. Bhatkar, and D. DuVarney. Model-carrying code: A practical approach for safe execution of untrusted applications, 2003.
 
17
D. Vanoverberghe, F. Piessens, T. Quillinan, F. Martinelli, and P. Mori. S3ms deliverable d4.1.0/d4.2.0 -- run-time compliance state of the art, November 2006.
18


Collaborative Colleagues:
Lieven Desmet: colleagues
Wouter Joosen: colleagues
Fabio Massacci: colleagues
Katsiaryna Naliuka: colleagues
Pieter Philippaerts: colleagues
Frank Piessens: colleagues
Dries Vanoverberghe: colleagues