ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Quorum sensing and self-stopping worms
Full text PdfPdf (179 KB)
Source
Workshop On Rapid Malcode archive
Proceedings of the 2007 ACM workshop on Recurring malcode table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Worms table of contents
Pages: 16 - 22  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-886-2
Authors
Ryan Vogt  University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
John Aycock  University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Michael J. Jacobson  University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 27,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1314389.1314394
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Random-scanning worms can be adapted, without a complex overlay control network, to stop their scanning activity once a certain percentage of all vulnerable hosts have been infected. This modification makes a worm more difficult to detect for a defender. This paper examines the theoretical concept of a perfect self-stopping algorithm, and discusses some of the limitations of Ma et al.'s Sum-Count-X self-stopping mechanism [7]. An alternative self-stopping mechanism based on the bacterial mechanism of quorum sensing [4] is suggested, and its feasibility is explored via simulation. Possible counter-measures to this new mechanism are also discussed


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
M. Dorigo, V. Maniezzo, and A. Colorni. Ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 26(1):29--41, February 1996.
 
4
J. M. Henke and B. L. Bassler. Bacterial social engagements. TRENDS in Cell Biology, 14(11):648--656, November 2004.
 
5
J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Neural Networks, pages 1942--1948, 1995.
 
6
J. Ma. Private e-mail communication, 17 November 2006.
7
 
8
D. L. Milton. Quorum sensing in vibrios: Complexity for diversification. Int. J. Med. Microbiol., 296(2--3):61--71, April 2006.
 
9
 
10
J. P. Pearson, L. Passador, B. H. Iglewski, and E. P. Greenberg. A second N-acylhomoserine lactone signal produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92(5):1490--1494, February 1995.
11
 
12
J. Stone. Detecting and recovering from a virus incident. Symantec Advantage, Summer 2003. http://www.symantec.com/symadvantage/019/recover.html.
 
13
 
14
R. Vogt, J. Aycock, and M. Jacobson, Jr. Army of botnets. In Proceedings of the 2007 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, pages 111--123, 2007.
 
15
B. Wiley. Curious Yellow: The first coordinated worm design. http://blanu.net/curious_yellow, last accessed 21 September 2006.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ryan Vogt: colleagues
John Aycock: colleagues
Michael J. Jacobson: colleagues