Sustainable virtual world ecosystems

ABSTRACT

This paper outlines an agenda for research that contributes to the development of sustainable virtual world ecosystems. It provides direction for understanding the social aspects of both trust and conflict. Trust is often referred to in research to examine the social interactions observed in virtual communities. It is an important theoretical factor affecting user intention to give and receive information. However, trust is a problematic construct, as it is based on culturally and historically specific assumptions about human association and social organization. Conflict and disagreement are usually viewed as undesirable behaviors in virtual worlds. The management of these behaviors is a difficult task in virtual environments where physical social controls are not available. Consequently, the moderation of participant behavior is seen as a challenge for virtual world creators, particularly as virtual world governance is likely to have a significant influence on member retention rates. A conflict-oriented research agenda provides a useful vehicle for interpreting the simultaneous pressures for both collaboration and competition in virtual worlds. Conflict is an integral structural element of the social interrelations found in both physical and virtual worlds. In this context, both agreement and disagreement are necessary to maintain the intricate social networks necessary for sustainable virtual world ecosystems.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bradley, C., and Froomkin, M. (2003). "Virtual Worlds, Real Rules," New York Law School Law Review, Vol. 49, No.1, pp. 103--146.
• 2: Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, London: Routledge.
• 3: Campbell, J., Fletcher, G., and Greenhill, A. (Forthcoming). "Conflict and Identity Shape Shifting in an Online Financial Community," Information Systems Journal.
• 4: Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E., and Moore, R.J. (2006). "Building an MMO With Mass Appeal: A Look at Gameplay in World of Warcraft," Games and Culture, Vol. 1, No.4, pp. 281--317.
• 5: Doolin, B., and McLeod, L. (2005). "Towards Critical Interpretivism in IS Research," in Howcroft, D., and Trauth, E.M. (Eds.), Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory and Application, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 244--271.
• 6: Gordon Fletcher , Anita Greenhill , John Campbell, Fight club: culture, conflict and everyday life amongst an online 'community', International Journal of Web Based Communities, v.2 n.4, p.474-489, December 2006 [doi>10.1504/IJWBC.2006.011771]
• 7: Greenfield, G., and Campbell, J. (2006). "Communicative Practices in Online Communication: A Case of Agreeing to Disagree," Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 16, No.3-4, pp. 267--277.
• 8: Greenhill, A., Campbell, J., and Fletcher, G. (2002). "Tribalism and Conflict: Conflict as a Social Unifier in a Technologically Enabled Community," AMCIS 2002 Proceedings of the Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, Texas, pp. 1634--1644.
• 9: Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa , Kathleen Knoll , Dorothy E. Leidner, Is anybody out there?: antecedents of trust in global virtual teams, Journal of Management Information Systems, v.14 n.4, p.29-64, March 1998
• 10: Kanayama, T. (2003). "Ethnographic Research on the Experience of Japanese Elderly People Online," New Media and Society, Vol. 5, No.2, pp. 267--288.
• 11: Knights D. (2001). "Chasing Shadows: Control, Virtuality and the Production of Trust," Organization Studies, Vol. 22, No.2, pp. 311--336.
• 12: Linden, C. (2007). "Introducing Estate Level Governance," Official Linden Blog, Retrieved July 15, 2007, from http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/04/20/introducing-estate-level-governance/.
• 13: McAllister, D.J. (1995). "Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No.1, pp. 24--59.
• 14: Montoya-Weiss, M.M., Massey, A.P., and Song, M. (2001). "Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No.6, pp. 1251--1262.
• 15: Jessica Mulligan , Bridgette Patrovsky , Raph Koster, Developing Online Games: An Insider's Guide, Pearson Education, 2003
• 16: Wanda J. Orlikowski, Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations, Organization Science, v.11 n.4, p.404-428, July 2000 [doi>10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600]
• 17: Paccagnella, L. (1997). "Getting the Seats of Your Pants Dirty: Strategies for Ethnographic Research on Virtual Communities," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 3, No.1, Retrieved July 15, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.html.
• 18: Ridings, C.M., Gefen, D., and Arinze, B. (2002). "Some Antecedents and Effects of Trust in Virtual Communities," Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 11, No.3-4, pp. 271--295.
• 19: Simmel, G. (1971). On Individuality and Social Forms, (D. Levine, Ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• 20: Shapiro, S.P. (1987). "The Social Control of Impersonal Trust," American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 93, No.3, pp. 623--658.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.1 Multimedia Information Systems

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces

  J. Computer Applications
  J.4 SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY
      K.4.1 Public Policy Issues

Keywords:
conflict, governance, identity, sustainability, trust, virtual worlds