ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Use of genetic algorithms for optimization in digital control of dynamic systems
Full text PdfPdf (495 KB)
Source ACM Annual Computer Science Conference archive
Proceedings of the 1992 ACM annual conference on Communications table of contents
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Pages: 219 - 224  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-89791-472-4
Author
Rajeshwar Prasad Srivastava  Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Towson State University, Towson, MD
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 39,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/131214.131242
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a method to optimize proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control parameters, given a discrete model of the controlled process. This method is based on Holland's genetic algorithm (GA). It does not require a mathematical model of the controller to represent its dynamic behavior. It gives a solution that is not only optimal but also meets engineering constraints. Genetic algorithms do a global search without derivatives for points in a multi-dimensional search space. This method works for non-linear as well as linear systems. The objective function of the GA is based on the integrated product of time and absolute error (ITAE). The performance of the GA is compared to that of the other optimization methods. The results show that it is simple and effective.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ziegler, J.G. and N.B. Nichols, "Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers." Transaction ofASME, vo164, pp 759- 768, 1942. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
 
2
Kinney, Thomas B. "Tuning Process Controllers." Chemical Engineed~, pp 67-72, September 1983.
 
3
 
4
Hemerly, Elder M., "PC-Based Packages for Identification, Optimization, and Adaptive Control," IEEE Control Systems, Feb. 1991, pp 37-43.
 
5
 
6
 
7
Gerry, J.P. "A Comparison of PID Control Algorithms'. Control Engineering, pp 102-105, March 1987.
 
8
Goldberg, David. F_. Genetic Algorithms, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. 1989
 
9
Goldberg, David E. "Optimal Initial Population Size for Binary-coded Genetic Algorithms'. TCGA R~ Number 850001, 1985. The Clearing House for Genetic Algorithms, Dept. of Engg. Mechanics, University of Alabama, 35486.
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
Kraus, T.W. and T.J. Myron, "Self-Tuning PID Controller Uses Pattern Recognition Approach," Control Engineering, June 1984, pp 106-111.