ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Task-structure analysis for knowledge modeling
Full text PdfPdf (2.77 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 35 ,  Issue 9  (September 1992) table of contents
Special issue on analysis and modeling in software development
Pages: 124 - 137  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
B. Chandrasekaran  Laboratory for AI Research, Department of Computer and Information Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Todd R. Johnson
Jack W. Smith  Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Medical Systems, 376 W. 10th Room 571, Columbus, Oh.
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 118,   Citation Count: 24
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/130994.131002
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Breuker, j. and Wielinga, B. Models of expertise in knowledge acquisition. In Topics in Expert System Design, G. Guida, C. Tasso, Eds. Eisevier Science B. V., North- Holland, 1989, pp. 265-295.
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
Chandrasekaran, R Generice tasks in knowledge-based reasoning: High-level building blocks for expert system design. IEEE Expert 1, 3 (1986), 23-30.
 
7
 
8
Chandrasekaran, B. Models versus rules, deep versus compiled content versus form' Some distinctions in knowledge systems research, iEEE Expert (Apr. 1991), 75-79.
 
9
Chandrasekaran, B. and Mittal, S. Conceptual representation of medicai knowledge for diagnosis by computer: MDX and related systems. In Advances in Computers, M. Yovits, Ed., Academic Press, 1983, 217- 293.
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
Eahelman L.More A knolage acquisition tool for cover-anddifferentiate systems. In Automating demic 1988, pp, 37-80.
 
14
Goel A. Soubdarajan, N. and Chandrasekaran, B. Complexity in classificatory reasoning. In Proceedings of AAAI (seattle Washington, July 13-18, 1987) pp. 421-425.
 
15
Gomez, F. and Chandrasekaran, B. Knowledge organization and distribution for medical diagnosis. IEEE 7%ans. Syst., Man and Cybernetics 1 I, I (1981), 34-42:
 
16
 
17
Johnson, K.A., Johnson, T.R., ore,m, j.w., jr., Dejongh, M., Fischer, O., Amra, N.K. and Bayazitoglu, A. RedSoar~A .9'stem r., e, v,,ua cellan,ooay ident cation. In Proceedings of SCAMC 91, McGraw Hill, Washington D.C., I0~1 ~gA t2Ro
 
18
 
19
Josephson, J., Chandrasekaran, B., Smith, j. and Tanner, M. A mechanism for fnrmino camrxnelfo _or= planatory hypotheses. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, and Cybernetics 17, 3 (1987), 445-454:
20
 
21
 
22
Marr, D. Vision. W.H. Freeman, New York, N.Y., 1982.
 
23
McDermott, J. R I' A rule-based configurer of computer systems. Artif InteiL 19, (1982), 39-R8
 
24
McDermott, J. Preliminary steps toward a taxonomy of problemsolving methods. In Automating Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems, S. Marcus, Ed., Kiuwer Academic 1988, pp. 225-256.
 
25
Mittal, S. and Chandrasekaran, B. Patrec: A knowledge-directed database for a diagnostic expert system. Computer 17, 9 (1984), 51-58.
 
26
 
27
Newell, A. The Knowledge Level, AI (Summer 1981), 1-19.
 
28
Rosenbloom, P.S. and A!tmann, E. Formulating the problem space Mellon Computer Science: A 25-Year Commemorative, R.F., Rashid, Ed., ACM Press: Adcdison-wesley, Reading, Mass., 1991.
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
32
 
33
Shortliffe, E.H. Computer-Based Medical Consultation: MYCIN EI-
 
34
 
35

CITED BY  24

Collaborative Colleagues:
B. Chandrasekaran: colleagues
Todd R. Johnson: colleagues
Jack W. Smith: colleagues