Lessons learned from a software process modeling system

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Lessons learned from a software process modeling system

Full text

Pdf (2.36 MB)

Source

Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 35 , Issue 9 (September 1992) table of contents
Special issue on analysis and modeling in software development

Pages: 91 - 100

Year of Publication: 1992

ISSN:0001-0782

Authors

Herb Krasner	Krasner Consulting, Austin, TX
Jim Terrel	SAIC Software Technology Center, Austin, TX
Adam Linehan	SAIC Software Technology Center, Austin, TX
Paul Arnold	Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA
William H. Ett	IBM, Gaithersburg, MD

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 8, Downloads (12 Months): 66, Citation Count: 6

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms review collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/130994.130999 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Agresti, W.W. Ed, What are the new paradigms? In new Paradigms for software Development (Tutorial). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 1986, 6-10.
	2	Cobb.R.H. Kouchakdjian, A. and Mills, H.D. The Cleanroom engineering so,ware development process. IBM STARS IR70/E CDRL 700I, by Sohware Engineering Technology, Inc., IBM Federal Sector Division Gaithersburg, Md., Feb. 28, 1991.
	3	Curtis, B. Measurement and experimentation of software engineering In Proceedings of the IEEE 68, 9, 1980, pp. 1144-1157.
	4	Curtis, B. Substantiating programmet variability. In Proceedings of the IEEE 69, 7, t981, pp. 846.
	5	Bill Curtis , Marc I. Kellner , Jim Over, Process modeling, Communications of the ACM, v.35 n.9, p.75-90, Sept. 1992 [doi>10.1145/130994.130998]
	6	Bill Curtis , Herb Krasner , Neil Iscoe, A field study of the software design process for large systems, Communications of the ACM, v.31 n.11, p.1268-1287, Nov. 1988 [doi>10.1145/50087.50089]
	7	W. Curtis , H. Krasner , V. Shen , N. Iscoe, On building software process models under the lamppost, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Software Engineering, p.96-103, March 1987, Monterey, California, United States
	8	Dowson, M, Ed, In Proceedings of The First International Conference on the software Process, sponsored by RMIZE. (Redondo Beach, Calif, Oct. 1991).
	9	GAO. Problems found with government acquitions and use of computers from Nov. 1965 to Dec. 1976. U.$. General Accounting Office Rep. FGMSD-77-14, Washington, DC, Mar. 1977.
	10	Watts S. Humphrey, Managing the software process, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1989
	11	Watts S. Humphrey , David H. Kitson , Tim C. Kasse, The state of software engineering practice, Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Software engineering, p.277-285, May 1989, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/74587.74626]
	12	Marc I. Kellner, Experience with enactable software process models, Proceedings of the 5th international software process workshop on Experience with software process models, p.85-88, October 10-13, 1989, Kennebunkport, Maine, United States
	13	Krasner, H. Requirements dynamics in large software projects: A perspective on new directions in teh software engineering process. 11th World Computer Congress (IFIP89) (Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Aug. 1989.), Elsevier B.V.
	14	Krasner, H. Continuous sohware process improvemenL Chap. 13 in Total quality management for soft- N.Y, N.Y., 1992.
	15	Krasner, H .Continujous software process improvement: A TQM strategy. In Proceedings of the Strategic software systesm Conference (Huntsville, Ala., Mar. 1992).
	16	Krasner, H. Continuous software process improvement: A tutorial. Fourth Annual USAF Software Technology Conference. (Salt Lake City, Ut. Apr. 1992).
	17	Krasner, H. The ASPIRE approach to continuous so,ware process improvement. In Proceedings of the Second IEEE Internationsl conference on Systems integration (Morfistown, NJ., June 1992).
	18	Krasner, H., Mclnroy, J. and Walz, D. Gruopware research and technotogy issues with application to software process management. In IEEE Trans. Syst. Man and Cybernetics (July 1991)
	19	Krasner, H. and Pore, M. A software process management approach to productivity and quality. In Proceedings of the Pacif Northwest Quality conference (Portland, Oreg., Sept. 1989).
	20	McCall, J. et. al. Factors in software quafity. GE-TIS-77CIS02, GenerM Electric Company, 1977.
	21	Mills, H.D. Dyer, M. and Linger, R.C. Cleanroom software engineering. IEEE Softw (Sept. 1987), 19-25.
	22	Ronald A. Radice , Richard W. Phillips, Software engineering: an industrial approach. Vol. 1, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1988
	23	Soflware-First Life Cycle Final Det: inifion Document. USAF ESD Contract F19628-88-D-0032, CDRL # 1240 FROM IBM FSD, Jan. 1990.
	24	Terrel, J.A. and Krasner, H.C. Desoftware process models in SPMS. In Proceedings of the Eigheh Annual NSIA Conference on software quality and Productivity (Washington, D.C., Mar. 1992).

CITED BY 7

	Diane B. Walz , Joyce J. Elam , Bill Curtis, Inside a software design team: knowledge acquisition, sharing, and integration, Communications of the ACM, v.36 n.10, p.63-77, Oct. 1993
	Sergio Bandinelli , Alfonso Fuggetta , Luigi Lavazza , Maurizio Loi , Gian Pietro Picco, Modeling and Improving an Industrial Software Process, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.21 n.5, p.440-454, May 1995
	Hossein Saiedian , Richard Kuzara, SEI Capability Maturity Model's Impact on Contractors, Computer, v.28 n.1, p.16-26, January 1995
	Naveed Ikram , Saffena Ramzan, Requirements change management process models: an evaluation, Proceedings of the 25th conference on IASTED International Multi-Conference: Software Engineering, p.66-71, February 13-15, 2007, Innsbruck, Austria
	Raymond M. Henry , Gordon E. McCray , Russell L. Purvis , Tom L. Roberts, Exploiting organizational knowledge in developing IS project cost and schedule estimates: An empirical study, Information and Management, v.44 n.6, p.598-612, September, 2007
	Loren G. Terveen , Peter G. Selfridge , M. David Long, Living design memory: framework, implementation, lessons learned, Human-Computer Interaction, v.10 n.1, p.1-37, March 1995
	G. T. Heineman , J. E. Botsford , G. Caldiera , G. E. Kaiser , M. I. Kellner , N. H. Madhavji, Emerging technologies that support a software process life cycle, IBM Systems Journal, v.33 n.3, p.501-529, July 1994

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
D. Software
D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
D.2.9 Management

General Terms:
Management

Keywords:
software process modeling

REVIEW

"Murat M. Tanik : Reviewer"

Since the publication of Humphrey's excellent book [1], process modeling is enjoying increasing interest among corporations and individuals interested in the management of large-scale software development. At Southern Methodist University, we more...

Collaborative Colleagues:

Herb Krasner: colleagues

Jim Terrel: colleagues

Adam Linehan: colleagues

Paul Arnold: colleagues

William H. Ett: colleagues

Adobe Acrobat

QuickTime

Windows Media Player

Real Player