ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On learning limiting programs
Full text PdfPdf (878 KB)
Source Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory archive
Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 193 - 202  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-89791-497-X
Authors
John Case  Department of CIS, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
Sanjay Jain  Department of CIS, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
Arun Sharma  School of Computer Science and Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2033, Australia
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 15,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/130385.130407
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Machine learning of limit programs (i.e., programs allowed finitely many mind changes about their legitimate outputs) for computable functions is studied. Learning of iterated limit programs is also studied. To partially motivate these studies, it is shown that, in some cases, interesting global properties of computable functions can be proved from suitable (n+1)-iterated limit programs for them which can not be proved from any n-iterated limit programs for them. It is shown that learning power is increased when (n+1)-iterated limit programs rather than n-iterated limit programs are to be learned. Many tradeoff results are obtained regarding learning power, number (possibly zero) of limits taken, program size constraints, and number of errors tolerated in final programs learned.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

AS83
 
Bar74
J.M. Barzdin. Two theorems on the limiting synthesis of functions. In Theory of Algorithms and Programs, Latvian State University, Riga, 210:82-88, 1974. In Russian.
 
BB75
L. Blum and M. Blum. Toward a mathematical theory of inductive inference. Information and Control, 28:125-155, 1975.
 
BCJS92
Blu67
 
Cas74
J. Case. Periodicity in generations of automata. Mathematical Systems Theory, 8:15- 32, 1974.
 
Cas86
J. Case. Learning machines. In W. Demopoulos and A. Marras, editors, Language Learning and Concept Acquisition. Ablex Publishing Company, 1986.
 
CCJ92
 
Che81
 
Che82
K. Chen. Tradeoffs in inductive inference of nearly minimal sized programs. Information and Control, 52:68-86, 1982.
 
CJS90
J. Case, S. Jain, and A. Sharma. Anomalous learning helps succinctness. In S. Arikawa, S. Goto, S. Ogsuga, and T. Yokomori, editors, Proceedings of the First Workshop on Algorithmic Learning Theory, Tokyo, Japan, pages 282-288. Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, October 1990.
 
Cra53
W. Craig. On axiomatizability within a system. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 18:30-32, 1953.
 
CS83
J. Case and C. Smith. Comparison of identification criteria for machine inductive inference. Theoretical Computer Science, 25:193- 220, 1983.
 
Fef60
S. Feferman. Arithmetization of metamathematics in a general setting. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 49:35-92, 1960.
 
Fre75
R. Freivalds. Minimal GSdel numbers and their identification in the limit. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 32:219-225, 1975.
 
Ful85
 
Gol65
E.M. Gold. Limiting recursion. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 30:28-48, 1965.
 
Gol67
E.M. Gold. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10:447-474, 1967.
 
HU79
 
KW80
R. Klette and R. Wiehagen. Research in the theory of inductive inference by GDR mathematicians - A survey. Information Sciences, 22:149-169, 1980.
 
LMF76
N. Lynch, A. Meyer, and M. Fischer. Relativization of the theory of computational complexity. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 220:243-287, 1976.
 
Mar89
Y. Marcoux. Composition is almost as good as s-1-1. In Proceedings, Structure in Complexity Theory-Fourth Annual Conference. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1989.
 
Men86
 
MY78
 
OSW86
 
Put65
H. Putnam. Trial and error predicates and the solution to a problem of Mostowski. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 30:49-57, 1965.
 
RC92
J. Royer and J. Case. Intensional Subrecursion and Complexity Theory. Research Notes in Theoretical Science. Pitman Press, being revised for expected publication, 1992.
 
Ric80
 
Ric81
G. Riccardi. The independence of control structures in abstract programming systems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 22:107-143, 1981.
 
Rog58
H. Rogers. GSdel numberings of partial recursive functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23:331-341, 1958.
 
Rog67
 
Roy87
 
Sha71
N. Shapiro. Review of "Limiting recursion" by E.M. Gold and "Trial and error predicates and the solution to a problem of Mostowski" by H. Putnam. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 36:342, 1971.
 
Sho59
J. Shoenfield. On degrees of unsolvability. Annals of Mathematics, 69:644-653, 1959.
 
Sho71
J. Shoenfield. Degrees of Unsolvability. North-Holland, 1971.
 
Soa87
 
Wie78
R. Wiehagen. Zur Therie der Algrithmischen Erkennung. PhD thesis, Humboldt- Universitat, Berlin, 1978.

Collaborative Colleagues:
John Case: colleagues
Sanjay Jain: colleagues
Arun Sharma: colleagues