ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Cryptographic lower bounds for learnability of Boolean functions on the uniform distribution
Full text PdfPdf (834 KB)
Source Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory archive
Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 29 - 36  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-89791-497-X
Author
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/130385.130388
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We investigate cryptographic lower bounds on the number of samples and on computational resources required to learn several classes of boolean circuits on the uniform distribution. Under the assumption that solving n x n1+&egr; subset sum is hard, we construct (using the results of Impagliazzo and Naor [IN89] and Goldreich, Goldwasser, and Micali[GGM86] a pseudo-random function generator that can be computed by shallow boolean circuits. From this we conclude that learning AC1 circuits on the uniform distribution requires &OHgr;(nlog log n) different samples, or, alternatively, that learning AC1 circuits on the uniform distribution with a polynomial number of samples is as hard as solving n x n1+&egr; subset sum. We also show that no algorithm can learn NC1 circuits on the uniform distribution with a polynomial number of samples. Using the weaker assumption that solving n x (1+&egr;)nsubset sum is hard, we show that the class of NC circuits can not be learned with nlogcn samples for any c.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

AK91
 
Blum89
A. Blum. Separating Distribution-Free and Mistake-Bounded Learning Models over the Boolean Domain In Proceedings of the 31st IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 211-218. IEEE, 1990. 444-454. ACM, 1991.
 
Br83
E. F. Brickell, Solving low density knapsacks, In Proceedings of Crypto 83, pp. 25-37.
 
CR88
B. Chor and R. L. Rivest, A Knapsack Type Public Key Crypto-System Based on arithmetic in finite fields, In IEEE Transaction on Information Theory Vol 34, pp. 901-909, 1988.
GGM86
GL89
 
Has86
 
IN89
R. Impagliazzo and M. Naor. Efficient Cryptographic Schemes Provably as Secure as Subset Sum. In Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 236-243. IEEE, 1989
KV89
LO85
 
LLL82
A. K. Lenstra, tt. W. Lenstra and L. Lovasz, Factoring polynomials woth rational coeffiecients. Math. Ann., vol 261, pp. 515-534, 1982.
 
Lev87
 
LMN89
N. Linial, Y. Mansour, and N. Nisan. Constant depth circuits, Fourier transform, and learnability. In Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Symposzum on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 574-579. IEEE, 1989
Man92
 
PW88
L. Pitt and M. Warmuth. Reductions among prediction problems: On the diff~culty of predicting automata. In Proceedings of the Thzrd Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference, pp. 60-69. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1988.
 
Sch89
R. E. Schapire. The strength of weak learnability. In Proceedings of the SOth Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 28-33. IEEE, 1989.
Val84