A reappraisal of structured analysis: design in an organizational context

ABSTRACT

We review Structured Analysis as presented by Yourdon and DeMarco. First, we examine the implicit assumptions embodied in the method about the nature of organizations, work processes, and design. Following this we present the results of an exploratory study, conducted to find out how the method is applied in practice. This study reveals that while some of the tools of Structured Analysis—notably the data flow diagrams—are used and combined with other tools, the designers do not follow the analysis and design procedures prescribed by the method. Our findings suggest that there is a gap between the way systems development is portrayed in the normative technical literature and the way in which it is carried out.

REFERENCES

• 1: ASTLEY, W. G. AND VAN DE VEN, A. H. Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Adm. Sci. Quart., 28, 2 (June 1983), 245 273.
• 2: Barry W. Boehm , Terence E. Gray , Thomas Seewaldt, Prototyping versus specifying: a multiproject experiment, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.10 n.3, p.290-302, May 1984 [doi>10.1109/TSE.1984.5010238]
• 3: Susanne Bø , Kaj Grøbæk, Cooperative prototyping: users and designers in mutual activity, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.34 n.3, p.453-478, March 1991 [doi>10.1016/0020-7373(91)90030-B]
• 4: B~)DKER, S., EHN, P., KYNG, M., KAMMERSGAARD J., AND SUNDBLAD, Y. A utopian experience. In Computers and Democracy. A Scandinavian Alternative, G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng, (Eds.), Avebury, Aldershot, 1987.
• 5: BUBENKO, J. Problems and unclear issues with hierarchical business activity and data flow modelling. SYSLAB Working Paper, No. 134, Stockholm, 1988.
• 6: B~DKER, K. Analysis and design of computer systems supporting complex administrative work processes. Off. Technol. People 4, i (Jan. 1989), 75-89.
• 7: CHAHN, N. Structured analysis and structured design: an overview. In Systems Analysis and Design: A Foundation for the 1980's, W. W. Cotterman, J. D. Couger, N. L. Enger, and F. Harold, Eds., North Holland, New York, 1981.
• 8: J. Daniel Couger, Evolution of Business System Analysis Techniques, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.5 n.3, p.167-198, Sept. 1973 [doi>10.1145/356619.356621]
• 9: Tom DeMarco, Structured Analysis and System Specification, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1979
• 10: DEMARcO, T. Structured analysis and system specification. In Classics ~n Software Engneerzng, E. Yourdon, Ed., Yourdon Press, New York, 1979.
• 11: DIJKSTRA, E. W Notes on Structured Progammmg. Technical Univ. Eindhoven, 1970.
• 12: EHN, P. Work-Orzented Design of Computer Artzfacts Arbetslivcentrum, Stockholm, 1988.
• 13: FISCHER, P., STRATMANN, W., LUNDSGAARDE, H. AND STEELE, D. User reaction to PROMIS. Comput. Appl. Medical Care, 3 (1980), 1722 1739.
• 14: FLOYD, C. A systematic look at prototyping. In Approaches to Prototyplng, R. Budde, K. Kuhlen Kamp, L. Mathlassen, and H. Ziillighoven, Eds., Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1984
• 15: C. Floyd, A comparative evaluation of system development methods, Proc. of the IFIP WG 8.1 working conference on Information systems design methodologies: improving the practice, p.19-54, July 1986, Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands
• 16: FLOYD, C. Outline of a paradigm change in software engineering, In Computers and Democracy, G. Bjerknes, P Ehn, and M. Kyng, Eds., Avebury, Aldershot, 1987.
• 17: FreEDMAN, A. Industry & Labour. MacMillan Press, London, 1977.
• 18: GALLAGHER, J., KRAUT, R., AND EGIDO, C., EDS. Intellectual Teamwork. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1990.
• 19: Chris P. Gane , Trish Sarson, Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1979
• 20: Joan Greenbaum , Morten Kyng, Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1992
• 21: GUrNDON, R. Designing the design process: exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Hum. Cornput. Interaction 5, 2/3 (1990), 305 344.
• 22: JORGENSEN, A. H. On the psychology of' prototyping. In Approaches to Prototyping, R. Budde, K. Kuhlenkamp, L. Matthiassen, and H. Zifiighoven, Eds., Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1984.
• 23: Peter G. W. Keen, Information systems and organizational change, Communications of the ACM, v.24 n.1, p.24-33, Jan. 1981 [doi>10.1145/358527.358543]
• 24: I~NSING, F. Towards evaluation of methods for property determination. In Beyond Productzvity: Informat~on Systems Development }'br Organizational Effectzveness, Th. M. A. Bemelsans, Ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984.
• 25: Finn Kensing , Kim Halskov Madsen, Generating visions: future workshops and metaphorical design, Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1992
• 26: KRAFT, P. AND DUBNOFF, S. Job content, fragmentation, and control in computer software work. Ind. Rel. 25, 2 (Sprmg 1986), 184 196.
• 27: KUSTERER, K. K~ow How on the Job. Westview Press, Boulder, Col., 1978.
• 28: LANZARA, G.F. The design process: frames, metaphors, and games In Systems Design For, Wtth, and By the Users, V. Briefs, C. Ciborra, and L. Schneider, Eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983.
• 29: M. Sundburg , G. Goldkuhl, Information Systems Development: A Systematic Approach, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1981
• 30: MADSEN, K.H. Breakthrough by breakdown: metaphors and structured domains In Systems Development for Humarl Progress, H. Klein and K. Kumar, Eds, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989.
• 31: MALHOTRA, A, THOMAS, J. C., CARROLL, J. M., AND MILLER, L. A. Cognitive processes in design. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 12 2 (Feb. 1980), 119-140.
• 32: NAUR, P. An experiment on program development. BIT 12, 3 (1972), 347-365.
• 33: NAUR, P. Programming as theory building. Mtcroprocess. Microprogram. 15 (1985), 253-261.
• 34: Charles R. Necco , Carl L. Gordon , Nancy W. Tsai, Systems analysis and design: current practices, MIS Quarterly, v.11 n.4, p.461-476, Dec. 1987 [doi>10.2307/248975]
• 35: T. William Olle , A. A. Verrijn Stuart , H. G. Sol, Information Systems Design Methodologies; A Comparative Review: Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on Comparative Review of Information Systems Design Methodologies, Noordwijkerhout, the Netherlands, 10-14 May 1982, Elsevier Science Inc., New York, NY, 1982
• 36: Julian E. Orr, Narratives at work: story telling as cooperative diagnostic activity, Proceedings of the 1986 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, December 03-05, 1986, Austin, Texas [doi>10.1145/637069.637077]
• 37: Kenneth T. Orr, Structured Systems Development, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1986
• 38: Stephen M. McMenamin , John F. Palmer, Essential systems analysis, Yourdon Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1984
• 39: RYLE, G. The Concept of Mind. Penguin Books, 1963.
• 40: Ross, D.T. Structured analysis (SA): A language for communicating ideas. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 3, i (Jan. 1977), 16 34.
• 41: STEVENS, W. P., MYERS, G. J. AND CONSTANTINE, L.L. Structured design. IBM Syst. J. 13, 2 (1974), 115 139.
• 42: Lucy A. Suchman, Office procedure as practical action: models of work and system design, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.1 n.4, p.320-328, Oct. 1983 [doi>10.1145/357442.357445]
• 43: Lucy A. Suchman, Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1987
• 44: TAYLOR, F.W. Scientiftc Management. New York and London, 1947. This is a single-volume edition of Shop Management (1903), Principles of Scientific Managements (1911), and Hearmgs Before Special Committee of the House of Representatives to Investigate the Taylor and Other Systems of Shop Management (1912).
• 45: VITALARI, N. P. A critical assessment of structured analysis methods: a psychological perspective. In Beyond Productiwty: Informatwns Systems Development for Organizational Ef/~ctweness, Bemelmans, Ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984.
• 46: Terry Winograd , Fernando Flores, Understanding computers and cognition, Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ, 1986
• 47: Niklaus Wirth, Program development by stepwise refinement, Communications of the ACM, v.14 n.4, p.221-227, April 1971 [doi>10.1145/362575.362577]
• 48: WYNN, E. Office Conversatwns as an Information Medium. University of California, Berkeley, 1979.
• 49: E. Yourdon, Managing the system life cycle; (2nd ed.), Yourdon Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1987
• 50: Edward Yourdon, Modern structured analysis, Yourdon Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1989
• 51: YOURDON, E. AND CONSTANTINE, L. L.. Structured Design. Yourdon Press/Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1979.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
        D.2.10 Design**

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
      D.2.9 Management
          Subjects: Life cycle

  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.0 General

  J. Computer Applications
  J.1 ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING
      Subjects: Financial (e.g., EFTS)

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.1 Project and People Management
          Subjects: Systems analysis and design

General Terms:
Design, Documentation, Management, Theory

Keywords:
design process, qualitative empirical studies, structured analysis