ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Parallel database systems: the future of high performance database systems
Full text PdfPdf (4.56 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 35 ,  Issue 6  (June 1992) table of contents
Pages: 85 - 98  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
David DeWitt  Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin, 1210 West Dayton Street, Madison, WI
Jim Gray  San Francisco Systems Center, Digital Equipment Corporation, 455 Market Street-7th Floor, San Francisco, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 144,   Downloads (12 Months): 438,   Citation Count: 186
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/129888.129894
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
Boral, H. and DeWitt, D. Database machines: An idea whose time has passed? A critique of the future of database machines. In Proceedings of the 1983 Workshop on Database Machines. H.-O. Leilich and M. Missikoff, Eds., Springer-Verlag, 1983.
 
4
5
6
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
Engelbert, S, Gray, J., Kocher, T., and Stah, P. A benchmark of nonstop SQL Release 2 demonstrating near-linear speedup and scaleup on large databases. Tandem Computers, Technical Report 89.4, Tandem Part No. 27469, May 1989.
 
11
 
12
 
13
Gibbs, J. Massively parallel systems, rethinking computing for business and science. Oracle 6, 1 (Dec. 1991).
14
15
 
16
Hirano, M.S. et al. Architecture of SDC., the super database computer. In Proceedings of JSPP '90. 1990.
 
17
 
18
Kitsuregawa, M., Tanaka, H., and Moto-oka, T. Application of hash to data base machine and its architecture, New Generation Computing 1,1 (1983).
 
19
Kitsuregawa. M., Yang, W., and Fushimi, S. Evaluation of 18-stage pipeline hardware sorter. In Proceedingsof the Third International Conference on Data Engineering (Feb. 1987).
 
20
 
21
Lorie, R., Daudenarde, J., Hallmark, G., Stamos, J., and Young, H. Adding intra-transaction parallelism to an existing DBMS: Early experience. IEEE Data Engineering Newsletter 12, 1 (Mar. 1989).
22
 
23
Ries, D. and Epstein R. Evaluation of distribution criteria for distrib uted database systems. UBC/ERL Technical Report M78/22, UC Berkeley, May, 1978.
 
24
Salem, K. and Garcia-Molina, H. Disk-striping. Department of Computer Science, Princeton University Technical Report EEDS-TR-322- 84, Princeton, N.J., Dec. 1984.
25
 
26
27
 
28
Stonebraker, M. Muffin: A distributed database machine. ERL Technical Report UCB/ERL M79/28, University of California at Berkeley, May 1979.
 
29
Stonebraker, M. The case for shared nothing. Datababase Eng. 9. 1 (1986).
 
30
 
31
32
 
33
Teradata Corporation. DBC/1012 Data Base Computer Concepts & Facilities. Document No. C02-0001- 00, 1983.
 
34
Tevanian, A., et al. A Unix interface for shared memory and memory mappecd files under Mach. Dept. of Computer Science Technical Report, Carnegie Mellon University, July, 1987.
35
 
36
The Performance Handbook for Database and Transaction Processing Systems. J. Gray, Ed., Morgan Kaufmann, San Marco, Ca., 1991.
 
37
38
 
39

CITED BY  186