Evaluation of vendor products

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Evaluation of vendor products: CASE tools as methodology companions

Full text

Pdf (1.96 MB)

Source

Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 35 , Issue 4 (April 1992) table of contents

Pages: 90 - 105

Year of Publication: 1992

ISSN:0001-0782

Authors

Iris Vessey	Department of Management Science and Information Systems, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa	Department of Management Science and Information Systems, University of Texas, Austin, TX
Noam Tractinsky	Department of Management Science and Information Systems, University of Texas, TX

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 45, Citation Count: 25

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/129852.129860 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Beth Adelson , Elliot Soloway, The role of domain experience in software design, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.11 n.11, p.1351-1360, Nov. 1985 [doi>10.1109/TSE.1985.231883]
	2	Brooks, R.E. Towards a theory ot the cognitive processes in computer programming. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 9, (1977), 737-751.
	3	D. N. Card , F. E. McGarry , G. T. Page, Evaluating software engineering technologies, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.13 n.7, p.845-851, July 1987 [doi>10.1109/TSE.1987.233495]
	4	John M. Carroll , Jean McKendree, Interface design issues for advice-giving expert systems, Communications of the ACM, v.30 n.1, p.14-32, Jan. 1987 [doi>10.1145/7885.7886]
	5	Albert F. Case, Computer-aided software engineering (CASE): technology for improving software development productivity, ACM SIGMIS Database, v.17 n.1, p.35-43, Fall 1985 [doi>10.1145/1040694.1040698]
	6	Peter Coad , Edward Yourdon, Object-oriented analysis (2nd ed.), Yourdon Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1991
	7	Couger, J.D., Cotter, M.E. and Knapp, R.W. Advanced System.~ Development/Feasibility Techniques. Wiley & Soils, N.Y., 1982.
	8	Curtis, B. Measurement and experimentation in sofiware engineering. In Proceedings of the IEEE 68, 9 (1980), pp. i 144-1157.
	9	Curtis, B. Substantiating programmer variability. In Proceeding~ of the IEEE 69, 7 (1981), pp. 846.
	10	Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of' inibrmation technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3 (Sepl. 1989), 319-339.
	11	Davis, J. A CASE plan for strategic planning. S?t. Build. (Apr./May 1989), 46-53.
	12	Denning, P.J. A hard look at structural programming. Structured Prog. lnfotech International, Maidenhead, 1976.
	13	Tom DeMarco, Structured Analysis and System Specification, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1979
	14	Desmond J. Start-up Index Tech jump-started CASE. Software Magazine (Apt. 1989), 84-88.
	15	Brian L. Dos Santos , Martin L. Bariff, A study of user interface aids for model-oriented decision support systems, Management Science, v.34 n.4, p.461-468, April 1988 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.34.4.461]
	16	F!aanen, P.O., McCubbrey, DJ., O'Riordan, P.D. and Burgess, K. Foundation~, of Business Syste~. Anderson Consulting/Dryden Press, Chicago, I11., 1989.
	17	Chris P. Gane , Trish Sarson, Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1979
	18	Gay, G. Interaction of learner controt and prior understanding in computer-assisted video instruction. J. Educational Psych. 78, 3 (June 1986), 225-227.
	19	Green, T.R.G. Programming as a cognitive activity. In Human Interaction with Computers. H.T. Smith and T.R.G. Green, Eds.,Academic Press, London, 1980.
	20	Raymonde Guindon , Herb Krasner , Bill Curtis, Breakdowns and processes during the early activities of software design by professionals, Empirical studies of programmers: second workshop, Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ, 1987
	21	Hannafin, M.J. Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction. J. lnstruc. Dev. 7, 3

CITED BY 25

	Srinarayan Sharma , Arun Rai, CASE deployment in IS organizations, Communications of the ACM, v.43 n.1, p.80-88, Jan. 2000
	Iris Vessey , Ajay Paul Sravanapudi, CASE tools as collaborative support technologies, Communications of the ACM, v.38 n.1, p.83-95, Jan. 1995
	Kathleen Knoll , Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa, Information technology alignment or “fit” in highly turbulent environments: the concept of flexibility, Proceedings of the 1994 computer personnel research conference on Reinventing IS : managing information technology in changing organizations: managing information technology in changing organizations, p.1-14, March 24-26, 1994, Alexandria, Virginia, United States
	Louise Scott , Levente Horvath , Donald Day, Characterizing case constraints, Communications of the ACM, v.43 n.11es, Nov. 2000
	David Budgen , Mitchell Thomson, CASE tool evaluation: experiences from an empirical study, Journal of Systems and Software, v.67 n.2, p.55-75, 15 August 2003
	Lars Mathiassen , Carsten Sørensen, Managing CASE introduction: beyond software process maturity, Proceedings of the 1994 computer personnel research conference on Reinventing IS : managing information technology in changing organizations: managing information technology in changing organizations, p.242-251, March 24-26, 1994, Alexandria, Virginia, United States
	Dinesh Batra , Nicole A. Wishart, Comparing a rule-based approach with a pattern-based approach at different levels of complexity of conceptual data modelling tasks, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.61 n.4, p.397-419, October 2004
	Cynthia K. Riemenschneider , Bill C. Hardgrave , Fred D. Davis, Explaining Software Developer Acceptance of Methodologies: A Comparison of Five Theoretical Models, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.28 n.12, p.1135-1145, December 2002
	Vijay Khatri , Sudha Ram , Richard T. Snodgrass, On augmenting database design-support environments to capture the geo-spatio-temporal data semantics, Information Systems, v.31 n.2, p.98-133, April 2006
	Magda Huisman , Juhani Iivari, Deployment of systems development methodologies: perceptual congruence between IS managers and systems developers, Information and Management, v.43 n.1, p.29-49, January 2006
	Russell Purvis, The extent of CASE technology use within systems development projects, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, v.13 n.3-5, p.151-158, July 2000
	Bill C. Hardgrave , Fred D. Davis , Cynthia K. Riemenschneider, Investigating Determinants of Software Developers' Intentions to Follow Methodologies, Journal of Management Information Systems, v.20 n.1, p.123-151, Number 1/Summer 2003
	Girish H. Subramanian , George E. Zarnich, An examination of some software development effort and productivity determinants in ICASE tool projects, Journal of Management Information Systems, v.12 n.4, p.143-160, March 1996
	Gerald V. Post , Albert Kagan , Robert T. Keim, A structural equation evaluation of CASE tools attributes, Journal of Management Information Systems, v.15 n.4, p.215-234, March 1999
	Solomon Antony , Radhika Santhanam, Could the use of a knowledge-based system lead to implicit learning?, Decision Support Systems, v.43 n.1, p.141-151, February, 2007
	David Jankowski, How can CASE help?: a look at the feasibility of supporting structured analysis with CASE, ACM SIGMIS Database, v.28 n.4, p.33-47, Fall 1997
	Radmila Juric, The UML rules, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.23 n.1, p.92-97, January 1998
	Kenneth Messa , Bogdan Czejdo, Visual software development using an object-relationship model, Proceedings of the 37th annual Southeast regional conference (CD-ROM), p.12-es, April 1999
	Xavier A. Debest , Rüdiger Knoop , Jürgen Wagner, Reveng: a cost-effective approach to reverse-engineering, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.17 n.4, p.60-67, Oct. 1992
	Donald L. Day, User responses to constraints in computerized design tools (extended abstract), ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.21 n.5, p.47-50, Sept. 1996
	Juhani Iivari , Rudy Hirschheim , Heinz K. Klein, A Dynamic Framework for Classifying Information Systems Development Methodologies and Approaches, Journal of Management Information Systems, v.17 n.3, p.179-218, Number 3/Winter 2000/01
	Jörg Zettel, Methodology Support in CASE Tools and Its Impact on Individual Acceptance and Use: A Controlled Experiment, Empirical Software Engineering, v.10 n.3, p.367-394, July 2005
	Eberhard U. Stickel, An experience with CASE tool support for financial product design, ACM SIGMIS Database, v.24 n.4, p.31-35, Nov. 1993
	David Jankowski, Computer-Aided Systems Engineering Methodology Supportand Its Effect on the Output of Structured Analysis, Empirical Software Engineering, v.2 n.1, p.11-38, 1997
	P. J. Guinan , J. G. Cooprider , S. Sawyer, The effective use of automated application development tools, IBM Systems Journal, v.36 n.1, p.124-139, 1997