ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Elements of a realistic CASE tool adoption budget
Full text PdfPdf (1.33 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 35 ,  Issue 4  (April 1992) table of contents
Pages: 45 - 54  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
Clifford C. Huff  Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 45,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   review  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/129852.129856
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Feuche, M. CASE training must begin before tools are installed. MIS Week (Feb. 19, 1990).
 
2
Fowler, P. and Rifkin, S. The software engineering process group guide. Tech. Rep. CMU/SEI-90- TR-24 Software Engineering Institute, 1990.
 
3
 
4
Grochow, J.M. Justifying the cost of CASE. Computerworld (Feb. 8, 1988).
 
5
Hamilton, R. CASE veterans say: Look before you leap. Computerworld (July 2 1990).
 
6
Huff, C.C., Smith, D., Stepien, K., Morris, E., and Zarrella, P. CASE Adoption Workshop. Tech. Rep. CMU/SEI-91-TR-14 To be published. Software Engineering Institute, 1992.
 
7
 
8
Humphrey, W. CASE planning and the software process. Tech. Rep. CMU/SEI-89-TR-34 Software Engineering Institute, i989.
 
9
Loh, M. and Nelson, R.R. Reaping CASE Harvests. Datamation (July 1989).
 
10
Lowe, A. Standards case still unsolved for CASE tools. Comput. Syst. News (June 19, 1989).
 
11
Maher, J. Managing technology change seminar. Developed by ODR, Inc. 1988. Offered by Software Engineering Institute, 1989.
 
12
Margotis, N. CASE standards debate rages: Sheer number of proposals hampers users, vendors, organizations. Computerworld I8 (Jan. 18 1988).
 
13
Morell, J., Tornatzky, L., and Behm, J. CASE implementation; Dynamics through the technology life cycle. Paper included in {6} Industrial Technology Institute, 1990.
 
14
O!son, T., Humphrey, W., and Kitson, D. Conducting SEl-assisted software process assessments, Tech. Rep. CMU/SEI-89-TR-7 Software Engineering Institute, 1989.
 
15
Rubin, H. How to become a software engineering 'Bigfoot'. Am. Program. (Jan. I990).
 
16
Rubin, H. CASE champion's toolkit--ln search of the true cost of CASE. CASE Outlook, 2 (1991).
 
17
Sorensen, K. Despite a slow start, CASE goes the distance. Dig. Rev. (Oct. 2, 1989).
 
18
Tornatsky, L,G. and Fleisher, M. The Process of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books, 1990.



REVIEW

"John E. Martin : Reviewer"

A special series of six papers in this issue of Communications of the ACM addresses the general area of CASE as it relates to software quality, the software development process, and management attitudes and e  more...