|
ABSTRACT
Recently, papers have appeared treating channels in presence of composite fading. Due to composite fading PDF complexity, gamma shadowing distribution instead of lognormal is proposed, to simplify analytical expressions. In order to estimate cell coverage in recent papers, only shadow fading model subdued to lognormal distribution was observed. In this paper, both mentioned models for cell coverage estimation are treated and compared: model with lognormal shadowing and model based on shadow fading which is subdued to gamma distribution (gamma shadowing). The impact of multipath fading, as part of path loss has been analyzed and expressed through composite fading model (Nakagami-m multipath/Gamma shadow fading). For all these models analytical closed forms for reliability parameters are derived (cell edge reliability and cell area reliability). Based on these results, reliability parameters in gamma shadowing and composite fading models are compared to a model which respects presence of lognormal shadowing, and presented in graphs. Also a simulation in order to compare different shadowing models and their impact on actual cell coverage has been made. In order to analyze signal coverage, cell radius estimation has been chose as relevant parameter for coverage verification and the effects of limited number of measured strength samples on cell radius estimation, using both proposed distributions, has been analyzed.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
M. K. Simon, M. S. Alouini, Digital Communication over Fading Channels, John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
I. M. Kosti, "An analytical approach to performance analysis for channel subject to shadowing and fading", IEEE Proc.-Communications, vol. 152, No. 6, 2005, pp. 821--827.
|
| |
5
|
M. Nakagami, "The m distribution, a general formula of intensity distribution of rapid fading," in Statistical Methods in Radio Wave Propagation. W.G. Hoffman, Ed. New York: Pergamon, 1960, pp. 3--36.
|
| |
6
|
P. Bernardin, M. Yee and T. Ellis, "Cell Radius Inaccuracy: A New Measure of Coverage Reliability," IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol 47, No 4, November 1998, pp. 1215--1226.
|
| |
7
|
Wolfram functions website, http://functions.wolfram.com
|
| |
8
|
Kanagalu R. Manoj, Coverage Estimation for Mobile Cellular Networks from Signal Strength Measurements, the University of Texas at Dallas, April 1999.
|
| |
9
|
Pete Bernardin, Meng Yee, Thomas Ellis, Cell Radius Inaccuracy: A New Measure of Coverage Reliability, Preprint of Publication in the November 1998 Issue (Vol. 47, No.4, pp. 1215--1226) of the IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
|
| |
10
|
Bernardin, P., Cell Radius: A Better RF Validation Criterion Than Area Reliability, 1st Annual UCSD Conference on Wireless Communications, March 8--10, 1998, La Jolla, CA.
|
| |
11
|
European Radiocommunications Committee (ERC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT), Monte--Carlo simulation methodology for the use in sharing and compatibility studies between different radio services and systems, Naples, February 2000.
|
| |
12
|
Ivo Kostic, Error dependence due to very slow fading and shadowing, Elmar, 2006.
|
| |
13
|
A. Annamalai, C. Tellambura, V. Bhargava, A general method for calculating error probabilities over fading channels, IEEE transactions and communications, Vol. 53 No. 5, May 2005.
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
I.
Computing Methodologies
I.6
SIMULATION AND MODELING
I.6.5
Model Development
Subjects:
Modeling methodologies
General Terms:
Algorithms,
Measurement,
Reliability,
Verification
Keywords:
cell area reliability,
cell coverage estimation,
cell edge reliability,
composite fading,
fading channel,
least squares method,
linear regression model,
multipath fading,
radius inaccuracy,
shadow fading,
shadowing
|