ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Can finite samples detect singularities of real-valued functions?
Full text PdfPdf (848 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Pages: 390 - 399  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-89791-511-9
Author
Shai Ben-David  Dept. of Computer Science, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel
Sponsor
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 10,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/129712.129749
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Consider the following type of problem: There is an unknown function, f : Rn → Rm, there is also a black-box that on query x (&egr; Rn) returns f(x). Is there an algorithm that, using probes to the black-box, can figure out analytic information about f? (For an example: “Is f a polynomial?”, “Is f a second order differentiable at x = (0,0,…,0)?” etc.). Clearly, for examples as these, if we bound the number of probes an algorithm has to settle for, no algorithm can carry the task. On the other hand, if one allows an infinite iteration of a “probe compute and guess” process, then, (quite surprisingly) for many such questions, there are algorithms that are guaranteed to be correct in all but finitely many of their guesses. We call such questions Decidable In the Limit, (DIL). We analyze the class of DIL problems and provide a necessary and sufficient condition for the membership of a decision problem in this class. We offer an algorithm for any DIL problem, and apply it to several types of learning tasks. Furthermore, if an a-priori probability distribution P, according to which f is being chosen, is available to the algorithm, then it can be strengthened into a finite algorithm. More precisely, for many distributions P, there exists a polynomial function, l, such that for every 0<&dgr;<1, there is an algorithm using at most l(log(&dgr;)) many probes that succeeds on more than (1–&dgr;) of the f's (as measured by P). We believe that the new approach presented here will be found useful for many further applications.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

AS83
 
Be91
Ben-David S., and Halevi S., "On the Independence of P versus NP', Technical Report #714, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
 
Bl72
Blum E.K., "Numerical Analysis and Computation: Theory and Practice" Addison- Wesley, 1972.
 
CY87
 
Co73
Cover M. T.," On Determining the Rationality of the Mean of a Random Variable", The Annals of Statistics, Vol. 1, No. 5, 862-871 (1973).
 
DP91
Dembo A,. and Peres Y., "A Topological Criteria for Hypothesis Testing" Unpublished manuscript, (1991).
 
Ga
Ga# S.A., "Point - Set Topology", Academic Press, 1964.
 
Go67
Gold E.M., "Language Identification in the Limit", Information and Control I0, 447-474 (1967).
 
HW58
Hoeffding W., and Wolfowitz J., "Distingulshability of Sets of Distributions", Annals of Mathematical Statistic8 29, 700-718, (1958).
 
KZ91
Kulkarni R.S., and Zeitouni O., "Can One Decide the Type of the Mean from the Empirical Measure?", Statistics and Probability Letters, ?? (1991).
 
Ro70
Rogers C. A., "Hausdorff Measures" Cambridge University Press, 1970.
 
ZK91
Zeitouni O., and Kulkarni R.S., "A General Classification Rule for ProbabiUty Measures", Submitted to Annals of Statistics.