ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Cooperation and quality in wikipedia
Full text PdfPdf (345 KB)
Source
International Symposium on Wikis archive
Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis table of contents
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Pages: 157 - 164  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-861-9
Authors
Dennis M. Wilkinson  HP Labs, Palo Alto, CA
Bernardo A. Huberman  HP Labs, Palo Alto, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 41,   Downloads (12 Months): 287,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1296951.1296968
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The rise of the Internet has enabled collaboration and cooperation on anunprecedentedly large scale. The online encyclopedia Wikipedia, which presently comprises 7.2 million articles created by 7.04 million distinct editors, provides a consummate example. We examined all 50 million edits made tothe 1.5 million English-language Wikipedia articles and found that the high-quality articles are distinguished by a marked increase in number of edits, number of editors, and intensity of cooperative behavior, as compared to other articles of similar visibility and age. This is significant because in other domains, fruitful cooperation has proven to be difficult to sustain as the size of the collaboration increases. Furthermore, in spite of the vagaries of human behavior, we show that Wikipedia articles accrete edits according to a simple stochastic mechanism in which edits beget edits. Topics of high interest or relevance are thus naturally brought to the forefront of quality.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
T. J. Allen. Studies of the problem solving process in engineering. IEEE Trans. Engineering Management, EM-13(2):72--83, 1966.
 
2
K. N. Berk. A central limit theorem for m-dependent random variables with unbounded m. Ann. Prob., 1(2):352--354, 1973.
3
 
4
 
5
A. Capocci, V. Servidio, F. Colaiori, L. Buriol, D. Donato, S. Leonardi, and G. Caldarelli. Preferential attachment in the growth of social networks: the case of Wikipedia. Phys. Rev. E, 74:036116, 2006.
 
6
T. Chesney. An empirical examination of Wikipedias credibility. First Monday, 11(11), 2006.
 
7
Scott Clearwater, Bernardo Huberman, and Tad Hogg. Cooperative solution of constraint satisfaction problems. Science, 254(5035):1181--1183, 1991.
 
8
H. Crawford. Encyclopedias. In R. Bopp and L. C. Smith, editors, Reference and information services: an introduction, 3rd ed., pages 433--459, Englewood, CO, 2001. Libraries Unlimited.
 
9
A. Desilets, S. Paquet, and N. Vinson. Are wikis usable? In Proc. ACM Wikisym, 2006.
 
10
Editorial. Britannica attacks... and we respond. Nature, 440, 2006.
 
11
 
12
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Fatally flawed: refuting the recent study on encyclopedic accuracy by the journal Nature, March 2006.
 
13
Jim Giles. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438:900--901, 2005.
 
14
N. Glance and B. A. Huberman. The dynamics of social dilemmas. Scientific American, March 1994.
 
15
B. A. Huberman and L. Adamic. Growth dynamics of the World Wide Web. Nature, 401:131, 1999.
 
16
A. Kittur, E. Chi, A. Pendleton, B. Suh, and T. Mytkowicz. Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. submitted for publication.
17
 
18
B. Leuf and W. Cunningham. The Wiki Way. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2001.
 
19
A. Lih. Wikipedia as participatory journalism. In Proc. 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism, austin, TX, 2004.
 
20
E. Da Lio, L. Fraboni, and T. Leo. Twiki-based facilitation in a newly formed academic community of practice. In Proc. ACM Wikisym, 2006.
21
 
22
U. Pfeil, P. Zaphiris, and C. S. Ang. Cultural differences in collaborative authoring of Wikipedia. J. Computer-mediated Comm., 12(1), 2006.
 
23
J. M. Reagle. A case of mutual aid: Wikipedia, politeness and perspective taking. In Proc. Wikimania, 2005.
 
24
J. Rice. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA, 2nd edition, 1995.
 
25
D. Riehle. How and why Wikipedia works: an interview. In Proc. ACM Wikisym, 2005.
 
26
S. M. Ross. Stochastic processes. John Wiley, New York, 1996.
 
27
D. Smith, J. Onnela, and N. Johnson. Accelerating networks. preprint.
 
28
A. Spoerri. What is popular on Wikipedia and why? First Monday, 12(4), 2007.
 
29
B. Stvilia, M. B. Twidale, L. C. Smith, and L. Gasser. Information quality work organization in wikipedia. preprint.
 
30
B. Stvilia, M. B. Twidale, L. C. Smith, and L. Gasser. Assessing information quality of a community-based encyclopedia. In Proc. ICIQ 2005, pages 442--454, Cambridge, MA, 2005.
31
 
32
 
33
J. Voss. Measuring Wikipedia. In Proc. ISSI 2005, Stockholm, 2005.
 
34
V. Zlotic, M. Bozicevic, H. Stefanic, and M. Domazet. Wikipedias: Collaborative web-based encylopedias as complex networks. Phys. Rev. E, 74, 2006.

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Dennis M. Wilkinson: colleagues
Bernardo A. Huberman: colleagues