ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Product integration improvement based on analysis of build statistics
Full text PdfPdf (48 KB)
Source Foundations of Software Engineering archive
The 6th Joint Meeting on European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on the foundations of software engineering: companion papers table of contents
Dubrovnik, Croatia
POSTER SESSION: ESEC/FSE'07 posters table of contents
Pages: 505 - 508  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-812-1
Authors
Stig Larsson  Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden
Petri Myllyperikö  ABB Distribution Automation, Vaasa, Finland
Fredrik Ekdahl  ABB Robotics, Västerås, Sweden
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
CEPIS : The Council of European Professional Informatics Societies
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 40,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1295014.1295027
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Process improvement efforts based on best practices and standards such as the CMMI use appraisal results as input and focus on implementing processes as described in reference models. Since these models are of a general character the conclusions from the assessments could easily overlook problems experienced in the daily work. In addition, process improvement programs often fail to engage practitioners. To improve this, data that can be related to the daily work can help. This paper reports on the results from a study performed to understand how process data can complement project appraisals in finding improvement possibilities. A method for mapping process data to different practices and combining this with project appraisals to form a basis for focused performance improvement is proposed and a study including four projects from three organizations is presented.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Briand, L. C., Differding, C. M:, Rombach, H. D. Practical Guidelines for Measurement-Based Process Improvement, Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Volume 20, Issue 5, (1996), 253--280
 
2
CMMI® Product Development Team, CMMI® for Development, Version 1.2. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2006-TR-008, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2006
 
3
Dybå, T., Skogstad, O. Measurement-based software process improvement, Telektronikk, Volume. 93, Issue. 1, (1997), 73--82
 
4
 
5
Fowler, M., Continuous Integration, http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html, (2006)
 
6
 
7
Houston, D. An Experience in Facilitating Process Improvement with an Integration Problem Reporting Process Simulation. Software Process Improvement and Practice 11, 4 (Jul 2006), 361 -- 371.
 
8
ISO/IEC 12207:1995, Information technology -- Software life cycle processes, ISO/IEC 1995.
 
9
ISO/IEC 15288:2002, International Standard, Systems engineering -- Systems life cycle processes, ISO/IEC 2002.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stig Larsson: colleagues
Petri Myllyperikö: colleagues
Fredrik Ekdahl: colleagues