| A comparison of linear skinning techniques for character animation |
| Full text |
Pdf
(7.11 MB)
|
| Source
|
Computer graphics, virtual reality, visualisation and interaction in Africa
archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Computer graphics, virtual reality, visualisation and interaction in Africa
table of contents
Grahamstown, South Africa
SESSION: Modelling II
table of contents
Pages: 177 - 186
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-906-7
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19, Downloads (12 Months): 132, Citation Count: 2
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Character animation is the task of moving a complex, artificial character in a life-like manner. A widely used method for character animation involves embedding a simple skeleton within a character model and then animating the character by moving the underlying skeleton. The character's skin is required to move and deform along with the skeleton. Research into this problem has resulted in a number of skinning frameworks. There has, however, been no objective attempt to compare these methods. We compare three linear skinning frameworks that are computationally efficient enough to be used for real-time animation: Skeletal Subspace Deformation, Animation Space and Multi-Weight Enveloping. These create a correspondence between the points on a character's skin and the underlying skeleton by means of a number of weights, with more weights providing greater flexibility. The quality of each of the three frameworks is tested by generating the skins for a number of poses for which the ideal skin is known. These generated skin meshes are then compared to the ideal skins using various mesh comparison techniques and human studies are used to determine the effect of any temporal artefacts introduced. We found that Skeletal Subspace Deformation lacks flexibility while Multi-Weight Enveloping is prone to overfitting. Animation Space consistently outperforms the other two frameworks.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Dragomir Anguelov , Daphne Koller , Hoi-Cheung Pang , Praveen Srinivasan , Sebastian Thrun, Recovering articulated object models from 3D range data, Proceedings of the 20th conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, p.18-26, July 07-11, 2004, Banff, Canada
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Cheung, G. K., Baker, S., and Kanade, T. 2003. Shape-from-silhouette of articulated objects and its use for human body kinematics estimation and motion capture. CVPR 01, 77.
|
| |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
Mohr, A., and Gleicher, M. 2003. Deformation sensitive deformation. Tech. Rep. 4/7/2003, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
|