ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users' motor and vision capabilities
Full text PdfPdf (549 KB)
Source
Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology archive
Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology table of contents
Newport, Rhode Island, USA
SESSION: Adaptation & examples table of contents
Pages: 231 - 240  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-679-2
Authors
Krzysztof Z. Gajos  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Jacob O. Wobbrock  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Daniel S. Weld  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 178,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1294211.1294253
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Most of today's GUIs are designed for the typical, able-bodied user; atypical users are, for the most part, left to adapt as best they can, perhaps using specialized assistive technologies as an aid. In this paper, we present an alternative approach: SUPPLE++ automatically generates interfaces which are tailored to an individual's motor capabilities and can be easily adjusted to accommodate varying vision capabilities. SUPPLE++ models users. motor capabilities based on a onetime motor performance test and uses this model in an optimization process, generating a personalized interface. A preliminary study indicates that while there is still room for improvement, SUPPLE++ allowed one user to complete tasks that she could not perform using a standard interface, while for the remaining users it resulted in an average time savings of 20%, ranging from an slowdown of 3% to a speedup of 43%.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
4
 
5
Chicowski, E. It's all about access. Alaska Airlines Magazine, 28(12):26--31, 80--82, 2004.
6
 
7
Fichten, C., M. Barile, J. Asuncion, and M. Fossey. What government, agencies, and organizations can do to improve access to computers for postsecondary students with disabilities: recommendations based on Canadian empirical data. Int J Rehabil Res, 23(3):191--9, 2000.
8
9
 
10
Gajos, K., A. Wu, and D. S. Weld. Cross-device consistency in automatically generated user interfaces. In Proceedings of Workshop on Multi-User and Ubiquitous User Interfaces (MU3I'05), 2005.
11
12
 
13
Gump, A., M. LeGare, and D. L. Hunt. Application of fitts' law to individuals with cerebral palsy. Percept Mot Skills, 94(3 Pt 1):883--895, June 2002.
14
 
15
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. H. Friedman. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer, August 2001.
16
17
 
18
International Organization for Standardization. 9241-9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices, 2000.
 
19
Keates, S., P. Clarkson, L. Harrison, and P. Robinson. Towards a practical inclusive design approach. ACM Press New York, NY, USA, 2000.
 
20
Koester, H. Abandonment of speech recognition by new users. Proc. RESNA'03, 2003.
21
 
22
Law, C., A. Sears, and K. Price. Issues in the categorization of disabilities for user testing. Proc. HCI Intl., 2005.
 
23
Mace, R., G. Hardie, P. Jaine, and N. C. S. U. C. for Universal Design. Accessible Environments: Toward Universal Design. Center for Accessible Housing, North Carolina State University, 1990.
24
25
 
26
Phillips, B. and H. Zhao. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol, 5(1):36--45, 1993.
 
27
Scott, I. U., W. J. Feuer, and J. A. Jacko. Impact of graphical user interface screen features on computer task accuracy and speed in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. Am. J. of Ophthalmology, 134(6):857--862, December 2002.
 
28
 
29
Smits-Engelsman, B., Rameckers, E., Duysens, and J. Children with congenital spastic hemiplegia obey fitts law in a visually guided tapping task. Experimental Brain Research, 177(4):431--439, March 2007.
 
30

CITED BY  9

Collaborative Colleagues:
Krzysztof Z. Gajos: colleagues
Jacob O. Wobbrock: colleagues
Daniel S. Weld: colleagues