ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The trecvid 2007 BBC rushes summarization evaluation pilot
Full text PdfPdf (275 KB)
Source
International Multimedia Conference archive
Proceedings of the international workshop on TRECVID video summarization table of contents
Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany
Pages: 1 - 15  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-780-3
Authors
Paul Over  National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD
Alan F. Smeaton  Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
Philip Kelly  Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
Sponsors
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 28
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1290031.1290032
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper provides an overview of a pilot evaluation of video summaries using rushes from several BBC dramatic series. It was carried out under the auspices of TRECVID. Twenty-two research teams submitted video summaries of up to 4% duration, of 42 individual rushes video files aimed at compressing out redundant and insignificant material. The output of two baseline systems built on straightforward content reduction techniques was contributed by Carnegie Mellon University as a control. Procedures for developing ground truth lists of important segments from each video were developed at Dublin City University and applied to the BBC video. At NIST each summary was judged by three humans with respect to how much of the ground truth was included, how easy the summary was to understand, and how much repeated material the summary contained. Additional objective measures included: how long it took the system to create the summary, how long it took the assessor to judge it against the ground truth, and what the summary's duration was. Assessor agreement on finding desired segments averaged 78% and results indicate that while it is difficult to exceed the performance of baselines, a few systems did.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Ding, W., Marchionini, G., & Tse, T. (1997). Previewing Video Data: Browsing Key Frames at High Rates Using a Video Slide Show. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Research, Development and Practice in Digital Libraries (pp. 151--158). Tsukuba Science City, Japan.
 
3
Ekin, A., Tekalp, A. M., & Mehrotra, R. (2003). Automatic Soccer Video Analysis and Summarization. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 12 (7), 796--807.
 
4
Ferman, A. M., & Tekalp, A. M. (2003). Two-Stage Hierarchical Video Summary Extraction to Match Low-Level User Browsing Preferences. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 5 (2), 244--256.
 
5
Hauptmann, A. (2007). Personal communication, School of Computer Science at Carnegie Mellon University.
6
7
 
8
Manly, B. F. J. (1997). Randomization, Bootstrap, and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology (2nd ed.). London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
9
 
10
mplayer. (2007). Mplayer - the Movie Player. URL: www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/news.html.
 
11
Smeaton, A. F., & Over, P. (2003). TRECVID: Benchmarking the effectiveness of information retrieval tasks on digital video. Proc. of the International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval (CIVR).
12
13
 
14
Taskiran, C. M., Pizlo, Z., Amir, A., Ponceleon, D., & Delp, E. J. (2006). Automated video program summarization using speech transcripts. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 8 (4), 775--791.
15
 
16
Wright, R. (2005). Personal communication, Technology Manager, Projects, BBC Information & Archives.

CITED BY  28

Collaborative Colleagues:
Paul Over: colleagues
Alan F. Smeaton: colleagues
Philip Kelly: colleagues