|
ABSTRACT
As an emerging technology, sensor networks provide the ability to accurately monitor the characteristics of wide geographical areas over long periods of time. The lifetime of individual nodes in a sensor network depends strongly on the leakage power that the nodes dissipate in the idle state, especially for low-throughput applications. With the introduction of advanced low power design techniques, such as sub-threshold voltage design styles, and the migration of fabrication processes to smaller technology generations, variability in leakage power dissipation of the sensor nodes will lead to increased variability in their lifetimes. In this paper, we analyze how this increased variability in the lifetime of individual sensor nodes affects the performance and lifetime of the network as a whole. We demonstrate how sensor network designers can use the proposed analysis framework to trade-off the cost of a sensor network deployment with the performance it offers. Our results indicate that up to 37% improvement in the critical lifetime of a sensor network (defined as the expected time at which the sensor network becomes disconnected) can be obtained over a baseline design with a 20% increase in the cost of the individual sensor nodes.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors 2005, http://public.itrs.net
|
 |
2
|
Shekhar Borkar , Tanay Karnik , Siva Narendra , Jim Tschanz , Ali Keshavarzi , Vivek De, Parameter variations and impact on circuits and microarchitecture, Proceedings of the 40th conference on Design automation, June 02-06, 2003, Anaheim, CA, USA
[doi> 10.1145/775832.775920]
|
| |
3
|
D. Chakrabarti, J. Leskovec, C. Faloutsos, S. Madden, C. Guestrin, and M. Faloutsos. Information survival threshold in sensor and P2P networks. Proceedings of 26th Annual IEEE ICC, 2007.
|
| |
4
|
Prabal Dutta , Mike Grimmer , Anish Arora , Steven Bibyk , David Culler, Design of a wireless sensor network platform for detecting rare, random, and ephemeral events, Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks, April 24-27, 2005, Los Angeles, California
|
| |
5
|
P. Gupta and P.R. Kumar. Critical power for asymptotic connectivity in wireless networks. Stochastic Analysis, Control, Optimization and Applications: A Volume in Honor of WH Fleming, 3(20):547--566, 1998.
|
 |
6
|
Scott Hanson , Bo Zhai , David Blaauw , Dennis Sylvester , Andres Bryant , Xinlin Wang, Energy optimality and variability in subthreshold design, Proceedings of the 2006 international symposium on Low power electronics and design, October 04-06, 2006, Tegernsee, Bavaria, Germany
[doi> 10.1145/1165573.1165660]
|
 |
7
|
Mark Hempstead , Gu-Yeon Wei , David Brooks, Architecture and circuit techniques for low-throughput, energy-constrained systems across technology generations, Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Compilers, architecture and synthesis for embedded systems, October 22-25, 2006, Seoul, Korea
[doi> 10.1145/1176760.1176805]
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
A. Papoulis. Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes. McGraw-Hill New York, 1991.
|
| |
10
|
R.C. Shah and J.M. Rabaey. Energy aware routing for low energy ad-hoc sensor networks. Proceedings of WCNC, 2002.
|
| |
11
|
V. Shnayder, M. Hempstead, B. Chen, G.W. Allen, and M. Welsh. Simulating the power consumption of large-scale sensor network applications. Proceedings of CASES, 2004.
|
| |
12
|
J.W. Tschanz, J.T. Kao, S.G. Narendra, R. Nair, D.A. Antoniadis, A.P. Chandrakasan, and V. De. Adaptive body bias for reducing impacts of die-to-die and within-die parameter variations on microprocessor frequency and leakage. IEEE Journal Of Solid-State Circuits, 37(11), 2002.
|
| |
13
|
C.-W. Yi, P.-J. Wan, X.-Y. Li, and O. Frieder. Asymptotic distribution of the number of isolated nodes in wireless ad hoc networks with Bernoulli nodes. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 54(20):510--517, 2006.
|
| |
14
|
|
|