| Attack vs. failure detection in event-driven wireless visual sensor networks |
| Full text |
Pdf
(374 KB)
|
Source
|
International Multimedia Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 9th workshop on Multimedia & security
table of contents
Dallas, Texas, USA
SESSION: Attacks
table of contents
Pages: 215 - 220
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-857-2
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 59, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In event-driven wireless Visual Sensor Networks (wVSNs), video nodes have access to additional data from scalar-sensors such as temperature or motion. The scalar-data may be used locally by the nodes instead of (or in conjunction with) vision technologies to control the potentially energy-costly transmission and storage of video frames and must thus be reliable. In this work we focus on the detection of occasional errors in such scalar-data sensors under both the scenario of harsh environmental conditions, and the scenario of hostile conditions involving an attacker. In the hostile case, the attack statistics may not be known to the cluster-head performing the error detection. We hence propose the use of a count detector in conjunction with Nash equilibrium analysis for the hostile case. We compare the detection performance of the count detector in hostile conditions to the performance of the optimal Neyman-Pearson (NP) detector which may be used under harsh conditions (scenario where the error statistics may be estimated). Through analysis and simulations we conclude that in this severe regime of attack with missing statistics, the count detector performs reasonably well compared with the optimal NP detector with significance for reliable event-driven wVSN.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
D. Biello. Camera Captures Image of Mysterious Creature in Borneo. December 7 2005.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
A. Czarlinska, W. Luh, and D. Kundur. Attacks on sensing in hostile wireless sensor-actuator environments. In IEEE Globecom, Washington, D. C., November 26-30.
|
| |
6
|
W.-C. Feng, J. Walpole, W.-C. Feng, and C. Pu. Moving towards massively scalable video-based sensor networks. In Workshop on New Visions for Large-Scale Networks: Research and Applications, page 385, Washington, DC, March 2001.
|
| |
7
|
Z. He and D. Wu. Resource allocation and performance analysis of wireless video sensors. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 16(5):590--9, May 2006.
|
| |
8
|
D. Kundur, W. Luh, and U. N. Okorafor. Emerging security paradigms for distributed multimedia sensor networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Special Issue on Distributed Multimedia, to appear 2007.
|
| |
9
|
K. Liu and A. Sayeed. Asymptotically optimal decentralized type-based detection in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, page 873, Montreal, May 2004.
|
| |
10
|
D. Maniezzo, K. Yao, and G. Mazzini. Energetic trade-off between computing and communication resource in multimedia surveillance sensor network. In 4th IEEE Conference on Mobile and Wireless Communications Networks (MWCN), page 373, Stockholm, Sweden, September 2002.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
F. Sivrikaya and B. Yener. Time synchronization in sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 18(4):45--50, July/August 2004.
|
| |
13
|
Norman Makoto Su , Heemin Park , Eric Bostrom , Jeff Burke , Mani B. Srivastava , Deborah Estrin, Augmenting Film and Video Footage with Sensor Data, Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom'04), p.3, March 14-17, 2004
|
|