ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Strong accountability for network storage
Full text PdfPdf (621 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Storage (TOS) archive
Volume 3 ,  Issue 3  (October 2007) table of contents
Article No. 11  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:1553-3077
Authors
Aydan R. Yumerefendi  Duke University, Durham, NC
Jeffrey S. Chase  Duke University, Durham, NC
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 173,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1288783.1288786
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This article presents the design, implementation, and evaluation of CATS, a network storage service with strong accountability properties. CATS offers a simple web services interface that allows clients to read and write opaque objects of variable size. This interface is similar to the one offered by existing commercial Internet storage services. CATS extends the functionality of commercial Internet storage services by offering support for strong accountability.

A CATS server annotates read and write responses with evidence of correct execution, and offers audit and challenge interfaces that enable clients to verify that the server is faithful. A faulty server cannot conceal its misbehavior, and evidence of misbehavior is independently verifiable by any participant. CATS clients are also accountable for their actions on the service. A client cannot deny its actions, and the server can prove the impact of those actions on the state views it presented to other clients.

Experiments with a CATS prototype evaluate the cost of accountability under a range of conditions and expose the primary factors influencing the level of assurance and the performance of a strongly accountable storage server. The results show that strong accountability is practical for network storage systems in settings with strong identity and modest degrees of write-sharing. We discuss how the accountability concepts and techniques used in CATS generalize to other classes of network services.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Amazon.com, Inc. 2007. Amazon simple storage service (Amazon S3). http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html?node=16427261.
 
3
4
 
5
Bayer, R. and McCreight, E. M. 1972. Organization and maintenance of large ordered indices. Acta Informatica 1, 173--189.
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
Ferraiolo, D. and Kuhn, R. 1992. Role-Based access controls. In 15th National Computer Security Conference.
 
12
13
 
14
Goodrich, M., Tamassia, R., and Schwerin, A. 2001. Implementation of an authenticated dictionary with skip lists and commutative hashing. In Proceedings of the DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition, 68--82.
 
15
 
16
Lampson, B. W. 2000. Computer security in the real world. In Proceedings of the Annual Computer Security Applications Conference.
17
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
25
 
26
Merkle, R. C. 1980. Protocols for public key cryptosystems. In Proceedings of the Sysmposium on Security and Privacy, 122--133.
 
27
Naor, M. and Nissim, K. 2000. Certificate revocation and certificate update. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. 18, 4, 561--570.
 
28
 
29
30
31
 
32
33
 
34
 
35
Tamassia, R. and Triandopoulos, N. 2003. On the cost of authenticated data structures. Tech. Rep., Brown University.
 
36
Trusted Computing Group. 2007. Trusted platform module specification. https://www. trustedcomputinggroup.org/groups/tpm/.
37
38


Collaborative Colleagues:
Aydan R. Yumerefendi: colleagues
Jeffrey S. Chase: colleagues