|
ABSTRACT
Wireless sensor networks are often deployed in hostile environments, where anadversary can physically capture some of the nodes. Once a node is captured, the attackercan re-program it and replicate the node in a large number of clones, thus easily taking over the network. The detection of node replication attacks in a wireless sensor network is therefore a fundamental problem. A few distributed solutions have recently been proposed. However, these solutions are not satisfactory. First, they are energy and memory demanding: A serious drawback for any protocol that is to be used in resource constrained environment such as a sensor network. Further, they are vulnerable to specific adversary models introduced in this paper. The contributions of this work are threefold. First, we analyze the desirable properties of a distributed mechanism for the detection of node replication attacks. Second, we show that the known solutions for this problem do not completely meet our requirements. Third, we propose a new Randomized, Efficient, and Distributed (RED) protocol for the detection of node replication attacks and we show that it is completely satisfactory with respect to the requirements. Extensive simulations also show that our protocol is highly efficient in communication, memory, and computation, that it sets out an improved attack detection probability compared to the best solutions in the literature, and that it is resistant to the new kind of attacks we introduce in this paper, while other solutions are not.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
A. Becher, Z. Benenson, and M. Dornseif. Tampering with motes: Real-world physical attacks on wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Security in Pervasive Computing (SPC), pages 104--118, 2006.
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
S. Capkun and J.-P. Hubaux. Secure positioning of wireless devices with application to sensor networks. In INFOCOM, pages 1917--1928, 2005.
|
| |
6
|
A. Caruso, A. Urpi, S. Chessa, and S. De. Gps-free coordinate assignment and routing in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '05, pages 150--160, 2005.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
M. Conti, R. Di Pietro, and L. V. Mancini. Ecce: Enhanced cooperative channel establishment for secure pair-wise communication in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 5(1):49--62, 2007.
|
| |
12
|
M. Conti, R. Di Pietro, L. V. Mancini, and A. Mei. Requirements and open issues in distributed detection of node identity replicas in wsn. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC '06), Special Session on Wireless Sensor Networks, page 66, 2006.
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
Roberto Di Pietro , Luigi V. Mancini , Alessandro Mei , Alessandro Panconesi , Jaikumar Radhakrishnan, Connectivity properties of secure wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the 2nd ACM workshop on Security of ad hoc and sensor networks, October 25-25, 2004, Washington DC, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1029102.1029112]
|
| |
17
|
R. Di Pietro, L. V. Mancini, A. Mei, A. Panconesi, and J. Radhakrishnan. Sensor networks that are provably resilient. In Proceedings of IEEE 2nd International Conference on Security and Privacy in Communication Networks (SecureComm 2006), to appear.
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
|
 |
22
|
|
 |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
Y. C. Hu, A. Perrig, and D. B. Johnson. Packet leashes: a defense against wormhole attacks in wireless networks. In INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-Second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. IEEE, pages 1976--1986, 2003.
|
| |
25
|
C. Karlof and D. Wagner. Secure routing in wireless sensor networks: attacks and countermeasures. Ad Hoc Networks, 1(2-3):293--315, 2003.
|
 |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
J. Kong, H. Luo, K. Xu, D. L. Gu, M. Gerla, and S. Lu. Adaptive Security for Multi-layer ad hoc Networks. Special Issue of Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, Wiley Interscience Press, 2002.
|
| |
28
|
|
 |
29
|
James Newsome , Elaine Shi , Dawn Song , Adrian Perrig, The sybil attack in sensor networks: analysis & defenses, Proceedings of the third international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks, April 26-27, 2004, Berkeley, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/984622.984660]
|
 |
30
|
|
| |
31
|
|
| |
32
|
|
| |
33
|
|
 |
34
|
|
CITED BY 6
|
|
Mauro Conti , Roberto Di Pietro , Luigi Vincenzo Mancini , Alessandro Mei, Emergent properties: detection of the node-capture attack in mobile wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Wireless network security, March 31-April 02, 2008, Alexandria, VA, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|