ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Trade-offs between mobility and density for coverage in wireless sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (578 KB)
Source
International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking archive
Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Mobile computing and networking table of contents
Montréal, Québec, Canada
SESSION: Sensor networks table of contents
Pages: 39 - 50  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-681-3
Authors
Wei Wang Vikram Srinivasan  National University of Singapore
Kee-Chaing Chua  National University of Singapore
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28,   Downloads (12 Months): 297,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1287853.1287860
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we study the coverage problem for hybrid networks which comprise both static and mobile sensors. We consider mobile sensors with limited mobility, i.e., they can move only once over a short distance. Such mobiles are simple and cheap compared to sophisticated mobile robots. In conventional static sensor networks, for a random deployment, the sensor density should increase as O(log L + k log log L) to provide k-coverage in a network with a size of L. As an alternative, an all mobile sensor network can provide k-coverage over the field with a constant density of O(k), independent of network size L. We show that the maximum distance that any mobile sensor will have to move is O(1 over √k log 3 over 4 (kL)). We then propose a hybrid network structure, comprising static sensors and a small fraction of O(1 over √(k)) of mobile sensors. For this network structure, we prove that k-coverage is achievable with a constant sensor density of O(k), independent of network size L. Furthermore, for this hybrid structure, we prove that the maximum distance which any mobile sensor has to move is bounded as O(log3 over 4 L). We then propose a distributed relocation algorithm, where each mobile sensor only requires local information in order to optimally relocate itself and characterize the algorithm's computational complexity and message overhead. Finally, we verify our analysis via extensive numerical evaluations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
S. Meguerdichian, F. Koushanfar, M. Potkonjak, and M. Srivastava, "Coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor network," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 2001.
2
3
4
 
5
 
6
G. Wang, G. Cao, and T. L. Porta, "Movement-assisted sensor deployment," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 2004.
 
7
Y. Zou and K. Chakrabarty, "Sensor deployment and target localization based on virtual forces," in all Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 2003.
 
8
S. Chellappan, X. Bai, B. Ma, and D. Xuan, "Sensor Networks Deployment Using Flip-Based Sensors," inallProceedings of IEEE MASS, 2005.
 
9
J. T. Feddema, R. H. Byrne, J. J. Harrington, D. M. Kilman, C. L. Lewis, R. D. Robinett, B. P. V. Leeuwen, and J. G. Young, "Advanced mobile networking, sensing, and controls," Technical Report SAND2005-1661, Sandia National Laboratories, 2005.
 
10
T. Leighton and P. W. Shor, "Tight bounds for minimax grid matching, with applications to the average case analysis of algorithms," Combinatorica, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161--187, 1989.
11
 
12
M. Zhang, X. Du, and K. Nygard, "Improving coverage performance in sensor networks by using mobile sensors," in Proceedings of IEEE MILCOM, 2005.
 
13
J. Wu and S. Yang, "SMART: A scan-based movement-assisted sensor deployment method in wireless sensor networks," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 2005.
 
14
J. Luo and J. P. Hubaux, "Joint mobility and routing for lifetime elongation in wireless sensor networks," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 2005.
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
Z. Lotker and A. Navarra, "Managing random sensor networks by means of grid emulation," in Proceedings of Networking (LNCS 3976), 2006, pp. 856--867.
 
20
P. Hall, Introduction to the theory of coverage processes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1988.
21
 
22
R. Williams, The Geometrical Foundation of Natural Structure: A Source Book of Design. Dover Publications, 1979.
 
23
G. Wang, G. Cao, and T. L. Porta, "Proxy-based sensor deployment for mobile sensor networks," in Proceedings of IEEE MASS, 2004.
 
24
G. Wang, G. Cao, T. L. Porta, and W. Zhang, "Sensor relocation in mobile sensor networks," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 2005.
 
25
E. Kratzel, Lattice points. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
 
26
A. Papoulis and S. U. Pillai, Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. 4th Ed. McGraw Hill, 2002.
 
27
 
28
 
29
S. Janson, T. Luczak, and A. Rucinski, Random Graphs. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2000.
30
 
31
 
32
M. Cardei, M. Thai, Y. Li, and W. Wu, "Energy-Efficient Target Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 2005.
33
 
34
W. Hoeffding, "Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables," Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 58, no. 301, pp. 13--30, 1963.
 
35
Web based demo for mobile sensors, http://cnds.ece.nus.edu.sg/mobile/mobile.html.
 
36
MIT Cricket platform, http://cricket.csail.mit.edu/.
 
37
Parallax Boe-Bot, http://www.parallax.com/html pages/robotics/boebot/boebot.asp.
 
38
Video for mobile implementations, http://cnds.ece.nus.edu.sg/mobile/mobile4.mpg.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Wei Wang Vikram Srinivasan: colleagues
Kee-Chaing Chua: colleagues