ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Computational strategies for object recognition
Full text PdfPdf (6.37 MB)
Source ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) archive
Volume 24 ,  Issue 1  (March 1992) table of contents
Pages: 5 - 62  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISSN:0360-0300
Authors
Paul Suetens  ESAT, Machine Intelligence and Imaging, K. U. Leuven, and Department of Radiology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Pascal Fua  Artificial Intelligence Center, Computer and Information Sciences Division, SRI International, Menlo Park, California and INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, Valbonne, France
Andrew J. Hanson  Artificial Intelligence Center, Computer and Information, Sciences Division, SRI International, Menlo Park, California and Department of Computer Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 133,   Citation Count: 21
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/128762.128763
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This article reviews the available methods for automated identification of objects in digital images. The techniques are classified into groups according to the nature of the computational strategy used. Four classes are proposed: (1) the simplest strategies, which work on data appropriate for feature vector classification, (2) methods that match models to symbolic data structures for situations involving reliable data and complex models, (3) approaches that fit models to the photometry and are appropriate for noisy data and simple models, and (4) combinations of these strategies, which must be adopted in complex situations. Representative examples of various methods are summarized, and the classes of strategies with respect to their appropriateness for particular applications.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
BALLARD, D. H. 1981. Generalizing the Hough transform to detect arbitrary shapes. Pattern Recogn. 13, 111-122.
 
4
 
5
BALLARD, D. H. AND SABBAH, D. 1981. On Shapes. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 607-612.
 
6
BAR~. A. H. 1981. Superquadrics and anglepreserving transformations. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 1, 11-23.
 
7
BELLMAN, R. AND DREYFUS, S. 1962. Applied Dynamic Programming, Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, N. J
 
8
BERGMAN, A AND MULGAONKAR, P. G. 1988. Neural networks for address-block ranking: A comparison with classical techniques. In Proceedings of USPS Third Advanced Technology Conference (Washington, D C., May, 3-5).
 
9
BINFORD, T. O. 1982. Survey of model-based image analysis systems. Int. J. Rob. Res. 1, 118-64.
 
10
BOBICK, A. F. AND BOLLES, R. C. 1989. Representation space: An approach to the integration of visual information. In Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (San Diego), IEEE Computer Science Press, Washington, 492-499.
 
11
 
12
BROOKS, R. A. 1981. Symbolic reasoning among 3-D models and 2-D images. Artif Intell. 17, 285-348.
 
13
BROOKS, R. A. 1983. Model-based threedimensiona( interpretations of two-dimensional images. IEEE Trans. Patt. A,al. Mach. Intell. PAMI 5, 2, 140-150.
 
14
 
15
CLOWES, M. B. 1971. On seeing things. Artif. Intell. 2, 1, 79-116.
 
16
 
17
DUDA, R. O. AND HART, P. E. 1973. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
 
18
 
19
FAN, T.-J., MED~ONI, G., AND NEVATIA, R. 1988. Matching 3-D objects using surface desriptions. In Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Philadelphia), pp. 1400-1406.
 
20
 
21
FAUGERAS, O. ANn BERTHOD, M. 1981. Improving consistency and reducing ambiguities in stochastic labeling: An optimization approach. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. PAM! 3, 4, 412 424.
 
22
FISCHLER, M. A. AND ELSCHLAGER, R. A. 1973. The representation and matching of pictorial structures. IEEE Trans. Comput. C-22, 1, 67-92.
 
23
FISCHLER, M. A., TENENBAUM, J. M., AND WOLF, H.C. 1981. Detection of roads and linear structures in low-resolution aerial imagery using a multisource knowledge integration technique. Comput. Graph. Image Process. 15, 201-223.
 
24
FUA, P. 1989. Object delineation as an optimization problem: A connection machine implementation. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Supercomputing (Santa Clara, Calif.), pp. 476-484.
 
25
FUA, P. AND HANSON, A. J. 1987. Using generic geometric models for intelligent shape extraction. In Proceedings of the AAAI 6th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (Los Altos, CA, July), Morgan-Kaufmann, pp 706-711.
 
26
FUA, P. AND HANSON~ A. J. 1988. Extracting generic shapes using model-driven optimization. In Proceedings of the DARPA Image Uaderstanding Workshop, pp. 994-1004.
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
GEMAN, S. AND GEMAN, D. 1984. Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI 6, 721-741.
 
31
GERBRANDS, J. J., BACKER, E., AND VAN DER HOEVEN, W. A. G. }986. Quantitative evaluation of edge detection by dynamic programming. In Pattern Recognitwn in Practice H, E. S. Gelsema and L. N. Kanal, Eds Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, pp. 91-99.
 
32
 
33
GROEN, F. C. A., TEN KATE, T. K. SMEULDERS, A. W. M., AND YOUNG, I. T. 1989. Human chromosome classification based on local band descriptors Pattern Recogn. Lett. 9, 3, 211-222.
 
34
HALL, E. L. 1979. Computer Image Processing and Recognition, Academic Press, New York.
 
35
 
36
 
37
 
38
HOUGH, P. V. C. 1962. Methods and Means for Recognizing Complex Patterns, U.S. Patent 3069654.
 
39
HUERTAS, A. COLE, W., AND NEVATIA, R. 1987. Detecting runways in aerial images. In Proceedings of the DARPA Image Understanding Workshop. pp. 272-297.
 
40
 
41
I-IuFFMAN, D. A. 1971, Impossible objects as nonsense sentences. Mach. Intell. 6, 295-323.
 
42
 
43
 
44
 
45
 
46
KANADE, T. 1980. Survey--Region segmentation: Signal versus semantics.Comput. Graph. Image Process. 13, 279-297.
 
47
KASS, M., WITKIN, A., AND TERZOPOULOS, D. 1987. SNAKES: Active contour models. Int. J. Comput. Vision 1, 4, 321-331.
 
48
KmKPATRICK, S., GELATT, C. D., AND VECCHI, M. P. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220, 671-680.
 
49
 
50
LAMDAN, Y. AND WOLFSON, H. J. 1988. Geometric hashing: A general and efficient model-based recognition scheme. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington.
 
51
LAWS, K. I. 1984. Goal-directed texture segmentation. Tech. Note 334, Artificial Intelligence Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, California. This method is an extension to the Ohlander et al. {1978} segmentation method.
 
52
LECLERC, Y. G. 1989. Constructing simple stable descriptions for image partitioning. Int. J. Comput. Vision 3, 73-102.
 
53
 
54
 
55
MACKWORTH, A. K. 1973. Interpreting pictures of polyhedral scenes. Artif. Intell. 4, 121-137
 
56
 
57
MALta, J. 1987. Interpreting line drawings of curved objects. Int. J. Comput. Vision 1, 73- 103.
 
58
 
59
 
60
MARR, D. 1982. Vision, W H. Freeman, San Francisco, Calif.
 
61
 
62
MCKEOWN, D. M. AND DENLINGER, J. L. 1988. Cooperative methods for road tracking m aerial imagery. In Proceedmgs of the IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Ann Arbor, Mich.), IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, pp. 662-672.
 
63
McKEowN, D. M., HARVEY, W. A., AND McDERMOTT, J. 1985. Rule-based interpretation of aerial images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI 7 5, 570-585
 
64
 
65
MOHAN, R. AND NEVATIA, R. 1988. Perceptual grouping for the detection and description of structures in aerial images In Proceedings of the DARPA Image Understanding Workshop (Los Altos, CA), Morgan-Kaufmann, pp. 512-526.
 
66
 
67
MULGAONKAR, P. G., SHAPIRO, L. G., AND HARALICK, R. M. 1984. Matching "sticks, plates and blobs" objects using geometric relational constraints. Image Vision Comput. 2, 2, 85-98.
 
68
 
69
 
70
NAGAO, M. 1984. Control strategies in pattern analysis. Pattern Recogn. 17, 1, 45-56.
 
71
NAGAO, M. AND MATSUYAMA, T. 1980. A Structural Analysis of Complex Aerial Photographs, Plenum Press, New York.
 
72
 
73
NAZIF, A. M. AND LEVINE, M. D. 1984. Low level image segmentation: An expert system. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI 6, 5, 555-577.
 
74
NIBLACK, W. AND PETKOVIC, D. 1988. On improving the accuracy of the Hough transform. In Proceedings of Computer Vlswn and Pattern Recognition (Ann Arbor, Mich.), IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, pp. 574-579.
 
75
NUYTS, J. MORTELMANS, L., SUETENS, P., OOSTERLINCK, A. AND DE ROO, M. 1989. Model-based quantification of myocardial perfusion images from SPECT. J. Nuclear Med. 30, 1992-2001.
 
76
OHLANDER, R., PaICE, K., AND REDDY, D. R. 1978. Picture segmentation using a recursive region splitting method. Comput. Graph. Image Process. 8, 3, 313-333.
 
77
 
78
PAVLIDIS, T. 1986. A critical survey of image analysis methods. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. (Paris, France), IEEE Press, NY, pp. 502-511.
 
79
 
80
 
81
PREMOLI, A., GRATTOM, P., AND POLLASTRI, F. 1989. A non-sequential contour detection with a prior knowledge. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 9, 45-51.
 
82
QUAM, L. H. 1978. Road tracking and anomaly detection in aerial imagery. SRI International AI Center Tech. Note 158. In Proceedings of the ARPA Image Understanding Workshop, (May) pp. 51-55.
 
83
 
84
REYNOLDS, G. O. DEVELIS, J. B., PARRENT, G. B., JR. AND THOMPSON, B. J. 1989. The new physical optics notebook: Tutorials in fourier optics. In Detectwn of Objects by Complex Inverse Filtering, SPIE and AIP, New York, pp. 417 420.
 
85
 
86
ROSENrELD, A. 1969. Picture Processing by Computer, Academic Press, New York.
 
87
 
88
ROSENFELD, A., HUMMEL, R. A., AND ZUCKER, S. W. 1976. Scene labeling by relaxation operations. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC 6, 6, 420-433.
 
89
SHANNON, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bells Syst. Tech. J. 27, 623-656.
 
90
 
91
SUETENS, P., SMETS, C., VAN DE WERF, F., AND OOSTERLINCK, A. 1989. Recognition of the coronary blood vessels on angiograms using hierarchical model-based iconic search. In Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (San Diego, Calif.), IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, pp. 576-581.
 
92
TENENBAUM, J. M. AND BARROW, H. G. 1977 Experiments in interpretation-guided segmentation. Artif Intell. 8, 241-274.
 
93
TENENBAUM, J. M., BARROW, H. G., BOLLES, R. C., FISCHLER, M. A., AND WOLF, H. C. 1979. Map-guided interpretation of remotely-sensed imagery. IEEE Pattern Recogn. Image Process., 610-617.
 
94
 
95
Tou, J. T. AND GONZALES, e. C. 1974. Pattern Recognition Principles, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
 
96
 
97
WANG, C.-H. AND SRIt{ARr, S. N. 1988. A framework for object recognition in a visually complex environment and its application to locating address blocks on mail pieces. Int. J. Comput. Vision 2, 125-151.
 
98
WHEELER, S. G. AND MISRA, P. N. 1980. Crop classification with landsat multispectral scanner data II. Pattern Reeogn. 12,219-228.
99
 
100
WITKIN, A, TERZOPOULOS, D., AND KASS, M. 1987b. Signal matching through scale space. Int. d. Comput. Vtsion 1, 2, 133 144.
 
101
Wv, Q., SUETENS, P., AND OOSTERLINCK, A. 1987. Toward an expert system for chromosome analysis. Knowledge-Based Syst. 1, 1, 43-52.
 
102
Wu, Q., SUETENS, P., AND OOSTERHNCK, A. 1989 On knowledge-based improvement of biomedical pattern recognition: A case study. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications (Miami, Fla.), IEEE, pp. 239-244.
 
103
 
104

CITED BY  21


REVIEW

"Keith E. Price : Reviewer"

Three major parts compose his survey paper on object recognition. The first provides an overview of computational techniques for object recognition. The second compares this survey with earlier review papers, describing the different approa  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Paul Suetens: colleagues
Pascal Fua: colleagues
Andrew J. Hanson: colleagues