|
ABSTRACT
There exist many natural phenomena where direct measurement is either impossible or extremely invasive. To obtain approximate measurements of these phenomena we can build prediction models based on other sensing modalities such as features extracted from data collected by an imager. These models are derived from controlled experiments performed under laboratory conditions, and can then be applied to the associated event in nature. In this paper we explore various different methods for generating such models and discuss their accuracy, robustness, and computational complexity. Given sufficiently computationally simple models, we can eventually push their computation down towards the sensor nodes themselves to reduce the amount of data required to both flow through the network and be stored in a database. The addition of these models turn in-situ imagers into powerful biological sensors, and image databases into useful records of biological activity.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
S. Ahmadian, T. Ko, S. Coe, M. Rahimi, S. Soatto, M. Hamilton, and D. Estrin. A vision system to infer avian nesting behavior. Technical report, University of California, Los Angeles, 2007.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
L. Breiman, J. Friedman, R. Olshen, and C. Stone. Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman and Hall, 1984.
|
| |
4
|
K. Chang, N. Yau, M. Hansen, and D. Estrin. Sensorbase. org-a centralized repository to slog sensor network data. DCOSS/EAWMS Proceedings, 2006.
|
| |
5
|
H. Drucker, C. Burges, L. Kaufman, A. Smola, and V. Vapnik. Support vector regression machines. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 9(9):155--161, 1997.
|
| |
6
|
Myron Flickner , Harpreet Sawhney , Wayne Niblack , Jonathan Ashley , Qian Huang , Byron Dom , Monika Gorkani , Jim Hafner , Denis Lee , Dragutin Petkovic , David Steele , Peter Yanker, Query by Image and Video Content: The QBIC System, Computer, v.28 n.9, p.23-32, September 1995
[doi> 10.1109/2.410146]
|
| |
7
|
A. Gitelson, Y. Gritz, and M. Merzlyak. Relationships between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for non-destructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology, 160(3):271--282, 2003.
|
| |
8
|
E. Graham. Perspectives in Biophysical Plant Ecophysiology: A Tribute to Park S. Nobel, chapter The Use of Digital Cameras in Plant Ecology and Ecophysiology. Lulu Press, San Diego, California, U.S.A., 2007.
|
| |
9
|
E. Graham, M. Hamilton, B. Mishler, P. Rundel, and M. Hanson. Use of a Networked Digital Camera to Estimate Net CO2 Uptake of a Desiccation-Tolerant Moss. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 167:751--758, 2006.
|
 |
10
|
Mohammad Rahimi , Rick Baer , Obimdinachi I. Iroezi , Juan C. Garcia , Jay Warrior , Deborah Estrin , Mani Srivastava, Cyclops: in situ image sensing and interpretation in wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 02-04, 2005, San Diego, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1098918.1098939]
|
| |
11
|
A. Richardson, J. Jenkins, B. Braswell, D. Hollinger, S. Ollinger, and M. Smith. Use of digital webcam images to track spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest. Ecosystem Ecology, 2007.
|
| |
12
|
A. Singh, D. Budzik, W. Chen, M. Batalin, M. Stealey, H. Borgstrom, and W. Kaiser. Multiscale Sensing: A new paradigm for actuated sensing of high frequency dynamic phenomena. Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pages 328--335, 2006.
|
 |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
P. Viola and M. Jones. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1:511--518, 2001.
|
| |
15
|
Wikipedia. HSV Color Space. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSV_color_space, 2006.
|
|