ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Formal and graphical annotations for digital objects
Full text PdfPdf (885 KB)
Source
SADPI; Vol. 259 archive
Proceedings of the 2007 international workshop on Semantically aware document processing and indexing table of contents
Montpellier, France
SESSION: Applications of semantic models table of contents
Pages: 69 - 78  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-668-4
Authors
Nicolas Moreau  LIRMM, CNRS -- Université Montpellier, Montpellier cedex -- France
Michel Leclère  LIRMM, CNRS -- Université Montpellier, Montpellier cedex -- France
Michel Chein  LIRMM, CNRS -- Université Montpellier, Montpellier cedex -- France
Alain Gutierrez  LIRMM, CNRS -- Université Montpellier, Montpellier cedex -- France
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1283880.1283893
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents graphical tools that facilitate manual building of formal semantic annotations for digital objects. These tools are intended to be integrated in digital object (DO) management systems requiring semantic metadata (e.g. precise indexation, comment, categorization, certification). We define a multidimensional graphical model of semantic annotations that specifically allows contextualization of annotations, and we propose a methodology for building such annotations. The graph-based formalism used (derived from Conceptual Graphs), provides graphical representations that users can easily understand, and are furthermore logically founded. A graphical generic API implementing elements of the SG family has been developed. CoGUI consists of three specialized tools: a tool for defining a CG ontology, another for creating annotations based on a CG ontology, and finally a tool that uses the CoGITaNT platform, for querying an annotated DO base.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
O. Aubert, P.-A. Champin, and Y. Prié. First international workshop on semantic web annotations for multimedia, 15th world wide web conference. In Proc. of SWAMM 2006, page 12.
 
2
J.-F. Baget. Simple Conceptual Graphs Revisited: Hypergraphs and Conjunctive Types for Efficient Projection Algorithms. In Proc. of ICCS'03, volume 2746 of LNAI. Springer, 2003.
 
3
J.-F. Baget and M.-L. Mugnier. Extensions of Simple Conceptual Graphs: The Complexity of Rules and Constraints. JAIR, 16:425--465, 2002.
 
4
O. Carloni, M. Leclère, and M.-L. Mugnier. Introducing graph-based reasoning into a knowledge management tool: An industrial case study. In IEA/AIE, pages 590--599, 2006.
 
5
M. Chein and M.-L. Mugnier. Conceptual Graphs: Fundamental Notions. Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle, 6(4):365--406, 1992.
 
6
 
7
M. Chein and M.-L. Mugnier. Types and Coreference in Simple Conceptual Graphs. In Proc. ICCS'04, LNAI. Springer, 2004.
 
8
M. Chein, M.-L. Mugnier, and G. Simonet. Nested graphs: A graph-based knowledge representation model with FOL semantics. In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 524--535, 1998.
 
9
CoGITaNT. Conceptual graphs integrated tools allowing nested typed graphs. http://cogitant.sourceforge.net, 1997.
 
10
F. Furst, M. Leclère, and F. Trichet. Operationalizing domain ontologies: a method and a tool. In 16th Europeean Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pages 318--322, 2004.
 
11
A. Kiryakov, B. Popov, I. Terziev, D. Manov, and D. Ognyanoff. Semantic annotation, indexing, and retrieval. Journal of Web Semantics, 2(1):227--250, 2005.
 
12
M. Koivunen and R. Swick. Collaboration through annotations in the semantic web. http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea/Papers/SAbook/annotea.html, 2001.
 
13
M. Leclère and M.-L. Mugnier. Simple Conceptual Graphs with Atomic Negation and Difference. In Proceedings of ICCS'06, pages 331--345, 2006.
 
14
L. Hollink, A. Th. Schreiber, B. Wielemaker, and B. Wielinga. Semantic annotation of image collections. In In Proceedings of the KCAP'03 Workshop on Knowledge Markup and Semantic Annotation, Florida, USA, October 2003.
 
15
 
16
K. Petridis, S. Bloehdorn, C. Saathoff, N. Simou, V. Tzouvaras, S. Handschuh, Y. Avrithis, Y. Kompatsiaris, S. Staab, and M. G. Strintzis. Knowledge representation and semantic annotation for multimedia analysis. IEE Proceedings on Vision, Image and Signal Processing, Special issue on the Integration of Knowledge, Semantics and Digital Media Technology, 153(3):253--394, 2006.
17
 
18
 
19
S. Schenk and S. Staab. Networked rdf graphs. Research Report RR3/2007, Universitat Koblenz-Landau, 2007.
 
20
 
21


Collaborative Colleagues:
Nicolas Moreau: colleagues
Michel Leclère: colleagues
Michel Chein: colleagues
Alain Gutierrez: colleagues