ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluating design tradeoffs in on-chip power management for CMPs
Full text PdfPdf (273 KB)
Source
International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design archive
Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Low power electronics and design table of contents
Portland, OR, USA
SESSION: Power-efficient CMP design table of contents
Pages: 44 - 49  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-709-4
Authors
Joseph Sharkey  Assured Information Security: Inc.
Alper Buyuktosunoglu  IBM TJ Watson Research Center
Pradip Bose  IBM TJ Watson Research Center
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 52,   Downloads (12 Months): 177,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1283780.1283791
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In light of the recent shift towards multi-core processor designs, dynamic power-management techniques that were designed for single-core microprocessors must be augmented with larger chip-level control. In this paper, we explore the design-tradeoffs associated with CMP power management solutions in a full-system simulation environment. We show that global power management solutions outperform solutions that locally manage power per-core. We then show that global power management is most effective at finer granularities that allow it to adapt to changing workload behavior and thus conclude that on-chip hardware solutions for CMP power management are an important consideration for future CMP microprocessors.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
P. Bohrer, J. Peterson, H. Shafi, "Mambo: Advances in PowerPC System Simulation", Invited Tutorial, 2003 IEEE Int'l Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS), March 9, 2003, Austin, Texas.
 
3
P. Bose, D. Brooks, A. Buyuktosunoglu, P. Cook, K. Das, P. Emma, M. Gschwind, H. Jacobson, T. Karkhanis, S. Schuster, J. Smith, V. Srinivasan, V. Zyuban, D. Albonesi, S. Dwarkadas. Early-Stage Definition of LPX: A Low Power Issue-Execute Processor Prototype. Power-Aware Computer Systems (PACS) workshop in conjunction with 8th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA-8), 2002.
4
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
9
 
10
R. Kalla, B. Sinharoy, and J. Tendler. IBM POWER5 Chip: A Dual-Core Multithreaded Processor. IEEE Micro, 24(2):40--47, Mar/Apr 2004.
 
11
P. Kongetira. A 32-way Multithreaded SPARC(R) Processor. Hot Chips 15, Aug 2004.
 
12
R. Kotla, A. Devgan, S. Ghiasi, T. Keller, and F. Rawson. Characterizing the Impact of Different Memory-Intensity Levels. In IEEE 7th Annual Workshop on Workload Characterization (WWC-7), Oct. 2004.
 
13
K. Krewell. UltraSPARC IV Mirrors Predecessor: Sun Builds Dual-Core Chip in 130nm. Microprocessor Report, Nov 2003.
 
14
J. Li and J. Martinez. Dynamic Power-Performance Adaptation of Parallel Computation on Chip Multiprocessors. In Proc. International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA-12), 2006.
 
15
16
 
17
C. McNairy and R. Bhatia. Montecito - The Next Product in the Itanium(R) Processor Family. Hot Chips 15, Aug 2004.
 
18
A. Merkel. Balancing Power Consumption in Multiprocessor Systems. PhD thesis, Sept. 2005. System Architecture Group, University of Karlsruhe, Diploma Thesis.
19
20
 
21
22
 
23
M. T. Zhang. Powering Intel(r) Pentium(r) 4 Generation Processors. In IEEE Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging Conference, pages 215--218, 2001.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Joseph Sharkey: colleagues
Alper Buyuktosunoglu: colleagues
Pradip Bose: colleagues