| Dynamic pricing for impatient bidders |
| Full text |
Pdf
(390 KB)
|
| Source
|
Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
archive
Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana
Pages: 726 - 735
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-0-898716-24-5
|
|
Authors
|
|
Nikhil Bansal
|
IBM TJ Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
|
|
Ning Chen
|
University of Washington, Seattle, WA
|
|
Neva Cherniavsky
|
University of Washington, Seattle, WA
|
|
Atri Rudra
|
University of Washington, Seattle, WA and IBM TJ Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
|
|
Baruch Schieber
|
IBM TJ Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
|
|
Maxim Sviridenko
|
IBM TJ Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Philadelphia, PA, USA
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8, Downloads (12 Months): 49, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
We study the following problem related to pricing over time. Assume there is a collection of bidders, each of whom is interested in buying a copy of an item of which there is an unlimited supply. Every bidder is associated with a time interval over which the bidder will consider buying a copy of the item, and a maximum value the bidder is willing to pay for the item. On every time unit the seller sets a price for the item. The seller's goal is to set the prices so as to maximize revenue from the sale of copies of items over the time period. In the first model considered we assume that all bidders are impatient, that is, bidders buy the item at the first time unit within their bid interval that they can afford the price. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that considers this model. In the offline setting we assume that the seller knows the bids of all the bidders in advance. In the online setting we assume that at each time unit the seller only knows the values of the bids that have arrived before or at that time unit. We give a polynomial time offline algorithm and prove upper and lower bounds on the competitiveness of deterministic and randomized online algorithms, compared with the optimal offline solution. The gap between the upper and lower bounds is quadratic. We also consider the envy free model in which bidders are sold the item at the minimum price during their bid interval, as long as it is not over their limit value. We prove tight bounds on the competitiveness of deterministic online algorithms for this model, and upper and lower bounds on the competitiveness of randomized algorithms with quadratic gap. The lower bounds for the randomized case in both models uses a novel general technique.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
Erik D. Demaine , Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi , Uriel Feige , Mohammad R. Salavatipour, Combination can be hard: approximability of the unique coverage problem, Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithm, p.162-171, January 22-26, 2006, Miami, Florida
[doi> 10.1145/1109557.1109577]
|
| |
6
|
Andrew V. Goldberg , Jason D. Hartline , Andrew Wright, Competitive auctions and digital goods, Proceedings of the twelfth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, p.735-744, January 07-09, 2001, Washington, D.C., United States
|
| |
7
|
Venkatesan Guruswami , Jason D. Hartline , Anna R. Karlin , David Kempe , Claire Kenyon , Frank McSherry, On profit-maximizing envy-free pricing, Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, January 23-25, 2005, Vancouver, British Columbia
|
 |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
|