ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Algorithms and incentives for robust ranking
Full text PdfPdf (471 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana
Pages: 425 - 433  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-0-898716-24-5
Authors
Rajat Bhattacharjee  Stanford University
Ashish Goel  Stanford University
Sponsors
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 66,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Spam in the form of link spam and click spam has become a major obstacle in the effective functioning of ranking and reputation systems. Even in the absence of spam, difficulty in eliciting feedback and self-reinforcing nature of ranking systems are known problems. In this paper, we make a case for sharing with users the revenue generated by such systems as incentive to provide useful feedback and present an incentive based ranking scheme in a realistic model of user behavior which addresses the above problems. We give an explicit ranking algorithm based on user feedback. Our incentive structure and ranking algorithm ensure that there is a profitable arbitrage opportunity for the users of the system in correcting the inaccuracies of the ranking. The system is oblivious to the source of inaccuracies (benign or malicious), thus making it robust to spam as well as the problems of eliciting feedback and self-reinforcement.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
R. Bhattacharjee, A. Goel. Incentive based ranking mechanisms. First workshop on the economics of networked systems, June 2006.
 
5
G. Bianconi, A-L. Barbasi. Competition and multiscaling in evolving networks. Europhysics letters, 54(4), 436--442, 2001
 
6
G. Birkhoff. Tres observaciones sobre el algebra lineal. Univ. Nac. Tucumán Rev. Ser. A, vol. 5 pp. 147--151, 1946.
 
7
8
9
10
 
11
 
12
L. Dumalge, I. Halperin. On a theorem of Frobenius-König and J. von Neumann's game of hide and seek. Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada III(3), vol. 49, pp. 23--29, 1955.
 
13
E. Friedman, P. Resnick. The social cost of cheap pseudonyms. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10(2):173--199. 2001.
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
G. H. Hardy, J. E. Littlewood, G. Pólya. Inequalities. 2nd edition, 1952, Cambridge University Press, London.
 
18
 
19
 
20
21
22
 
23
A. W. Marshall, I. Olkin. Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications, 1979, Academic Press, New York.
24
 
25
26
 
27
J. von Neumann. A certain zero-sum two-person game equivalent to the optimal assignment problem. In Contributions to the optimal assignment problem to the Theory of Games. Princeton Univ. Press, 1953, vol. 2, pp.5--12.
 
28
B. Null. A discussion of click-through algorithms for web page ranking. Available at http://www.stanford.edu/~null/ClickThroughAlg_Tutorial.pdf.
 
29
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, T. Winograd. The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.
30
 
31
D. Vise. Clicking to steal. Washington Post Magazine, F01, April 17 2005.
 
32
H. Zhang, A. Goel, R. Govindan, K. Mason, B. Van Roy. Making eigenvector-based reputation systems robust to collusion. Workshop on Algorithms and Models for the Web Graph (WAW) 2004.

CITED BY  8
Collaborative Colleagues:
Rajat Bhattacharjee: colleagues
Ashish Goel: colleagues