ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Model-driven optimization using adaptive probes
Full text PdfPdf (460 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana
Pages: 308 - 317  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-0-898716-24-5
Authors
Sudipto Guha  University of Pennsylvania
Kamesh Munagala  Duke University
Sponsors
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 51,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

In several applications such as databases, planning, and sensor networks, parameters such as selectivity, load, or sensed values are known only with some associated uncertainty. The performance of such a system (as captured by some objective function over the parameters) is significantly improved if some of these parameters can be probed or observed. In a resource constrained situation, deciding which parameters to observe in order to optimize system performance itself becomes an interesting and important optimization problem. This problem is the focus of this paper. Unfortunately designing optimal observation schemes is NP-HARD even for the simplest objective functions, leading to the study of approximation algorithms.

In this paper we present general techniques for designing non-adaptive probing algorithms which are at most a constant factor worse than optimal adaptive probing schemes. Interestingly, this shows that for several problems of interest, while probing yields significant improvement in the objective function, being adaptive about the probing is not beneficial beyond constant factors.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
4
 
5
6
 
7
8
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
S. Guha, K. Munagala, and S. Sarkar. Performance guarantees through partial information based control in multichannel wireless systems. Available at http://www.cs.duke.edu/~kamesh/partialinfo.pdf.
 
18
19
 
20
A. Gupta and M. Pál. Stochastic steiner trees without a root. Proc. of ICALP, pages 1051--1063, 2005.
 
21
A. Gupta, M. Pál, R. Ravi, and A. Sinha. What about wednesday? Approximation algorithms for multistage stochastic optimization. Proc. of APPROX-RANDOM, pages 86--98, 2005.
 
22
 
23
24
25
 
26
 
27
A. Krause and C. Guestrin. Near-optimal nonmyopic value of information in graphical models. Twenty-first Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2005), 2005.
28
 
29
G. L. Nemhauser, L. A. Wolsey, and M. L. Fisher. An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions-I. Math Programming, 14(1):265--294, 1978.
 
30
 
31
 
32
 
33

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sudipto Guha: colleagues
Kamesh Munagala: colleagues