|
ABSTRACT
It is well-known that the integrality gap of the usual linear programming relaxation for Maxcut is 2 - ε. For general graphs, we prove that for any ε and any fixed bound k, adding linear constraints of support bounded by k does not reduce the gap below 2 - ε. We generalize this to prove that for any ε and any fixed bound k, strengthening the usual linear programming relaxation by doing κ rounds of Sherali-Adams lift-and-project does not reduce the gap below 2 - ε. On the other hand, we prove that for dense graphs, this gap drops to 1 + ε after adding all linear constraints of support bounded by some constant depending on ε.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
Michel Deza and Monique Laurent Geometry of Cuts and Metrics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997.
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
A. M. Frieze and R. Kannan Quick Approximation to matrices and applications, Combinatorica 19 (2) (1999) pp 175--200.
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
L. Lovasz and A. Schrijver, Cones of matrices and setfunctions, and 0-1 optimization, SIAM J. of Optimization 1 (1990) 166--190.
|
| |
20
|
S Poljak and Zs. Tuza. On the expected relative error of the polyhedral approximation of the max-cut, Oper. Res. Letters 16 (1994) 191--198.
|
| |
21
|
|
|