ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Achieving convergence-free routing using failure-carrying packets
Full text PdfPdf (335 KB)
Source
Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications table of contents
Kyoto, Japan
SESSION: Reliability table of contents
Pages: 241 - 252  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-713-1
Also published in ...
Authors
Karthik Lakshminarayanan  University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Matthew Caesar  University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Murali Rangan  University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Tom Anderson  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Scott Shenker  University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Ion Stoica  University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Sponsors
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 122,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1282380.1282408
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Current distributed routing paradigms (such as link-state, distance-vector, and path-vector) involve a convergence process consisting of an iterative exploration of intermediate routes triggered by certain events such as link failures. The convergence process increases router load, introduces outages and transient loops, and slows reaction to failures. We propose a new routing paradigm where the goal is not to reduce the convergence times but rather to eliminate the convergence process completely. To this end, we propose a technique called Failure-Carrying Packets (FCP) that allows data packets to autonomously discover a working path without requiring completely up-to-date state in routers. Our simulations, performed using real-world failure traces and Rocketfuel topologies, show that: (a) the overhead of FCP is very low, (b) unlike traditional link-state routing (such as OSPF), FCP can provide both low loss-rate as well as low control overhead, (c) compared to prior work in backup path pre-computations, FCP provides better routing guarantees under failures despite maintaining lesser state at the routers.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Abilene observatory data collections. 2006. http://abilene.internet2.edu/observatory/.
 
2
Anonymized OC48 traces, CAIDA. 2006.http://data.caida.org/.
 
3
C. Alaettinoglu, V. Jacobson, and H. Yu. Towards Millisecond IGP Convergence. IETF Draft, 2000.
 
4
A. Atlas. U-turn Alternates for IP/LDP Fast-Reroute. Internet Draft draft-atlas-ip-local-protect-uturn-03.txt, February 2006.
5
 
6
S. Bryant, C. Filsls, S. Previdi, and M. Shand. IP Fast Reroute using Tunnels. Internet draft draft-bryant-ipfrr-tunnels-01.txt, Oct 2004.
 
7
S. Bryant and M. Shand. A Framework for Loop-free Convergence. Internet Draft draft-bryant-shand-lf-conv-frmwk-03, October 2006.
 
8
S. Bryant, M. Shand, and S. Previdi. IP Fast Reroute Using Not-via Addresses. Internet Draft draft-bryant-shand-ipfrr-notvia-addresses-03, 2006.
 
9
 
10
G. Choudhury. Prioritized Treatment of Specific OSPF Version 2 Packets and Congestion Avoidance. RFC 4222, October 2005.
 
11
G. Choudhury, A. Atlas, R. Torvi, C. Martin, B. Imhoff, and D. Fedyk. Basic Specification for IP Fast-Reroute: Loop-free Alternates. IETF draft, 2005.
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
P. Francois and O. Bonaventure. Avoiding transient loops during IGP convergence in IP networks. In Proc. INFOCOM, 2005.
 
16
17
 
18
G. Iannaccone, C. Chuah, S. Bhattacharyya, and C. Diot. Feasibility of IP Restoration in a Tier-1 Backbone. IEEE Networks, Special Issue, March 2004.
 
19
Juniper-Networks. Configure alternate backup paths using fate-sharing. 2005. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos53/swconfig53mpls-apps/html/mpls-signaled-config37.html.
 
20
N. Kushman, S. Kandula, D. Katabi, and B. Maggs. R-BGP: Staying Connected in a Connected World. In Proc. NSDI, 2007.
21
 
22
 
23
J. T. Moy. OSPF Version 2. RFC 2328, April 1998.
 
24
J. T. Moy. OSPF complete implementation. In Addison-Wesley, New York, 2001.
 
25
 
26
S. Nelakuditi, S. Lee, Y. Yu, J. Wang, Z. Zhong, G. -H. Lu, and Z. -L. Zhang. Blacklist-Aided Forwarding in Static Multihop Wireless Networks. In Proc. of SECON, 2005.
 
27
 
28
P. Pan, G. Swallow, and A. Atlas. Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels. RFC 4090, May 2005.
29
 
30
31
 
32
R. Teixeira, N. Duffield, J. Rexford, and M. Roughan. Traffic Matrix Reloaded: Impact of Routing Changes. In Proc. of PAM, 2005.
33
34
35


Collaborative Colleagues:
Karthik Lakshminarayanan: colleagues
Matthew Caesar: colleagues
Murali Rangan: colleagues
Tom Anderson: colleagues
Scott Shenker: colleagues
Ion Stoica: colleagues