ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Resolving inter-domain policy disputes
Full text PdfPdf (370 KB)
Source
Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications table of contents
Kyoto, Japan
SESSION: Routing table of contents
Pages: 157 - 168  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-713-1
Also published in ...
Authors
Cheng Tien Ee  UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Vijay Ramachandran  Colgate University, Hamilton, NY
Byung-Gon Chun  UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Kaushik Lakshminarayanan  Indian Institute of Technology: Madras, Madras, India
Scott Shenker  UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Sponsors
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 77,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1282380.1282399
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) allows each autonomous system (AS) to select routes to destinations based on semantically rich and locally determined policies. This autonomously exercised policy freedom can cause instability, where unresolvable policy-based disputes in the network result in interdomain route oscillations. Several recent works have established that such instabilities can only be eliminated by enforcing a globally accepted preference ordering on routes (such as shortest path). To resolve this conflict between policy autonomy and system stability, we propose a distributed mechanism that enforces a preference ordering only when disputes resulting in oscillations exist. This preserves policy freedom when possible, and imposes stability when required.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. A. Cobb, M. G. Gouda, and R. Musunuri. A Stabilizing Solution to the Stable Paths Problem. In Symposium on Self-Stabilizing Systems, Springer-Verlag LNCS, pages 169--183. ACM Press, 2003.
2
 
3
 
4
L. Gao, T. G. Griffin, and J. Rexford. Inherently Safe Backup Routing with BGP. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2001. IEEE Computer Society, IEEEPress, April 2001.
 
5
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
T. G. Griffin and G. Wilfong. A Safe Path Vector Protocol. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2000. IEEE Communications Society, IEEE Press, March 2000.
 
10
A. D. Jaggard and V. Ramachandran. Robustness of Class-Based Path-Vector Systems. In Proceedings of ICNP'04, pages 84--93. IEEE Computer Society, IEEE Press, October 2004.
 
11
 
12
Y. Rekhter, T. Li, and e. Susan Hares. A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4). RFC 4271, January 2006.
 
13
University of Oregon RouteViews Project. http://www.routeviews.org.
 
14
 
15
L. Subramanian, S. Agarwal, J. Rexford, and R. H. Katz. Characterizing the internet hierarchy from multiple vantage points. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM 2002, New York, NY, Jun 2002.
 
16
H. Tangmunarunkit, R. Govindan, S. Shenker, and D. Estrin. The impact of routing policy on internet paths. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM 2001, Anchorage, AK, Apr 2001.
 
17
K. Varadhan, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. Persistent Route Oscillations in Inter-domain Routing. Computer Networks, 32(1):1--16, March 2000.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Cheng Tien Ee: colleagues
Vijay Ramachandran: colleagues
Byung-Gon Chun: colleagues
Kaushik Lakshminarayanan: colleagues
Scott Shenker: colleagues