| Canonical image selection from the web |
| Full text |
Pdf
(3.67 MB)
|
| Source
|
Conference On Image And Video Retrieval
archive
Proceedings of the 6th ACM international conference on Image and video retrieval
table of contents
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Pages: 280 - 287
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-733-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
Yushi Jing
|
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA and Google Inc., Mountain View, CA
|
|
Shumeet Baluja
|
Google Inc., Mountain View, CA
|
|
Henry Rowley
|
Google Inc., Mountain View, CA
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22, Downloads (12 Months): 101, Citation Count: 2
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The vast majority of the features used in today's commercially deployed image search systems employ techniques that are largely indistinguishable from text-document search - the images returned in response to a query are based on the text of the web pages from which they are linked. Unfortunately, depending on the query type, the quality of this approach can be inconsistent. Several recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of using image features to refine search results. However, it is not clear whether (or how much) image-based approach can generalize to larger samples of web queries. Also, the previously used global features often only capture a small part of the image information, which in many cases does not correspond to the distinctive characteristics of the category. This paper explores the use of local features in the concrete task of finding the single canonical images for a collection of commonly searched-for products. Through large-scale user testing, the canonical images found by using only local image features significantly outperformed the top results from Yahoo, Microsoft and Google, highlighting the importance of having these image features as an integral part of future image search engines.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
R. Fergus, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman. A visual category filter for google images. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Computer Vision, Prague, Czech Republic, pages 242--256, May 2004.
|
| |
4
|
Myron Flickner , Harpreet Sawhney , Wayne Niblack , Jonathan Ashley , Qian Huang , Byron Dom , Monika Gorkani , Jim Hafner , Denis Lee , Dragutin Petkovic , David Steele , Peter Yanker, Query by Image and Video Content: The QBIC System, Computer, v.28 n.9, p.23-32, September 1995
[doi> 10.1109/2.410146]
|
| |
5
|
C. Harris and M. Stephens. A Combined Corner and Edge Detector. In PRoc. 4th ALVEY Vision Conference, pages 147--151, 1988.
|
| |
6
|
R. Jain. Infoscopes, multimedia information systems. Multimedia Systems and Techniques, 1996.
|
| |
7
|
S. Lazebnik, C. Schmid, and J. Ponce. A sparse texture representation using affine-invariant regions. In Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2003., pages 319--324, 2003.
|
| |
8
|
T. Liu, A. W. Moore, A. Gray, and K. Yang. An investigation of practical approximate nearest neighbor algorithms. In Proc. 17th Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pages 825--832, Cambridge, MA, 2005. MIT Press.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
G. Park, Y. Baek, and H. Lee. Majority based ranking approach in web image retrieval. pages 111--120, 2003.
|
| |
12
|
Y. Rui, T. Huang, and S. Chang. Image retrieval: current techniques, promising directions and open issues. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 10(4):39--62, Apr. 1999.
|
| |
13
|
|
CITED BY 2
|
|
|
|
|
Yi Hsuan Yang , Po Tun Wu , Ching Wei Lee , Kuan Hung Lin , Winston H. Hsu , Homer H. Chen, ContextSeer: context search and recommendation at query time for shared consumer photos, Proceeding of the 16th ACM international conference on Multimedia, October 26-31, 2008, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
|
|