The impact of sponsored results on the quality of information gatekeepers

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

The impact of sponsored results on the quality of information gatekeepers

Full text

Pdf (248 KB)

Source

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 258 archive
Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Electronic commerce table of contents

Minneapolis, MN, USA

SESSION: Session M7: sponsored search on the internet II table of contents

Pages: 147 - 152

Year of Publication: 2007

ISBN:978-1-59593-700-1

Authors

Hemant Bhargava	University of California at Davis, Davis, CA
Juan Feng	University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

Sponsors

SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 43, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1282100.1282131 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Information gatekeepers, such as Internet search engines, travel experts, comparison shopping systems, credit raters, radio deejays, and movie critics, are an essential entry point for many information search and decision making tasks. They make recommendations on these tasks based on their expertise, but also frequently due to sponsorship by interested merchants. We develop and analyze a tractable model in which consumers may prefer or dislike the use of sponsored results in the recommendations, merchants' value for sponsorship increases with the gatekeeper's user base, and when there are negative externalities among merchants competing for consumers' attention. The optimal strategy strikes a balance between sponsorship revenues from merchants and user-based revenues. The gatekeeper may employ sponsored recommendations even when doing so is detrimental to users, or may not present enough sponsored results even when these improve the quality of recommendations. Product innovations or better domain expertise give the gatekeeper greater flexibility in using sponsored results.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Rajiv D. Banker , Inder Khosla , Kingshuk K. Sinha, Quality and Competition, Management Science, v.44 n.9, p.1179-1192, September 1998 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1179]
	2	S. Basuroy, S. Chatterjee, and S. A. Ravid. How critical are critical reviews? the box office effects of film critics, star power and budgets. Journal of Marketing, 67:103--117, October 2003.
	3	Hemant K. Bhargava , Vidyanand Choudhary, Economics of an Information Intermediary with Aggregation Benefits, Information Systems Research, v.15 n.1, p.22-36, March 2004 [doi>10.1287/isre.1040.0014]
	4	G. Biglaiser. Middlemen as experts. RAND Journal of Economics, 24:212--223, 2002.
	5	Yuxin Chen , Ganesh Iyer , V. Padmanabhan, Referral Infomediaries, Marketing Science, v.21 n.4, p.412-434, October 2002 [doi>10.1287/mksc.21.4.412.135]
	6	Duncan G. Copeland , Richard O. Mason , James L. McKenney, Sabre: The Development of Information-Based Competence and Execution of Information-Based Competition, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, v.17 n.3, p.30-57, September 1995 [doi>10.1109/85.397059]
	7	Duncan G. Copeland , James L. McKenney, Airline reservations systems: lessons from history, MIS Quarterly, v.12 n.3, p.353-370, Sept. 1988 [doi>10.2307/249202]
	8	M. Cotlier. The payoff of paid search listings. Catalog Age, 18, Aug 2001.
	9	J. Eliashberg and S. M. Shugan. Film critics: Influencers or predictors? Journal of Marketing, 61(2):68--78, April 1997.
	10	Juan Feng , Hemant K. Bhargava , David M. Pennock, Implementing Sponsored Search in Web Search Engines: Computational Evaluation of Alternative Mechanisms, INFORMS Journal on Computing, v.19 n.1, p.137-148, January 2007 [doi>10.1287/ijoc.1050.0135]
	11	G. Hsu and J. M. Podolny. Critiquing the critics: An approach for the comparative evaluation of critical schemas. Social Science Research, 3(1):189--214, 2005.
	12	L. D. Introna and H. Nissenbaum. Shaping the web: Why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society, 16(3), 2000.
	13	G. F. Lastowka. Do paid placement listings infringe trademarks?Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, 14:1--7, July 2002.
	14	Lawrence Lessig, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, Basic Books, Inc., New York, NY, 1999
	15	R. W. McChesney. Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. The New Press, New York, NY, 1999.
	16	R. McLuhan. Search for a top ranking. Marketing, page 47, October 2000.
	17	P. Milgrom and J. Roberts. Price and advertising signals of product quality. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4):796--821, 1986.
	18	T. A. Weber and E. Z. Zheng. A model of search intermediaries and paid referrals. Technical report, 02-12-01, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 2005.
	19	R. O. Wyatt and D. P. Badger. How reviews affect interest in and evaluation of film. Journalism Quarterly, 61:874--878, 1984.