|
ABSTRACT
Humans are "smart components" in a system, but cannot be directly programmed to perform; rather, their autonomy must be respected as a design constraint and incentives provided to induce desired behavior. Sometimes these incentives are properly aligned, and the humans don't represent a vulnerability. But often, a misalignment of incentives causes a weakness in the system that can be exploited by clever attackers. Incentive-centered design tools help us understand these problems, and provide design principles to alleviate them. We describe incentive-centered design and some tools it provides. We provide a number of examples of security problems for which Incentive Centered Design might be helpful. We elaborate with a general screening model that offers strong design principles for a class of security problems.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
K. Chellapilla, K. Larson, P. Simard, and M. Czerwinski. Computers beat humans at single character recognition in reading based human interaction proofs (hips). In Conference on Email and Anti-Spam, 2005.
|
| |
4
|
Y. Chen, X. Li, and J. K. MacKie-Mason. Online fund-raising mechanisms: A field experiment. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 5(2), 2006.
|
| |
5
|
C. Dwork, A. Goldberg, and M. Naor. On memory bound functions for fighting spam. In G. Goos, J. Hartmanis, and J. van Leeuwan, editors, Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO 2003, number 2729 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 426--444. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
J.-J. Laffont and D. Martimort. The Theory of Incentives. Princeton University Press, 2001.
|
| |
10
|
B. Laurie and R. Clayton. Proof of work proves not to work. In Workshop on the Economics of Information Security, 2004.
|
| |
11
|
D. Liu and L. J. Camp. Proof of work can work. Technical report, NET Institute, October 2006. Working Paper No. 06-18.
|
| |
12
|
T. Loder, M. van Alstyne, and R. Wash. An economic response to unsolicited communication. Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, 6(1), 2006.
|
| |
13
|
J. MacKie-Mason, S. Shenker, and H. Varian. Service architecture and content provision: The network provider as editor. Telecommunications Policy, 20(3), April 1996.
|
| |
14
|
A. Mas-Colell, M. D. Whinston, and J. R. Green. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, 1995.
|
| |
15
|
R. B. Myerson. Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica, 47(1):61--74, 1979.
|
| |
16
|
R. Naraine. 'detailed exploit' published for critial windows flaw. eWeek.com, June 26 2006.
|
| |
17
|
R. Naraine. Microsoft's security disclosures come under fire. eWeek.com, April 13 2006.
|
 |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
The Honeynet Project. Know your enemy: Tracking botnets. Published on the Web.
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
L. von Ahn, M. Blum, N. Hopper, and J. Langford. Captcha: Using hard AI problems for security. In Proceedings of EUROCRYPT 03, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2003.
|
 |
22
|
|
|