ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An event-based framework for characterizing the evolutionary behavior of interaction graphs
Full text PdfPdf (839 KB)
Source
International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining table of contents
San Jose, California, USA
SESSION: Industrial and government track papers table of contents
Pages: 913 - 921  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-609-7
Authors
Sitaram Asur  Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Srinivasan Parthasarathy  Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Duygu Ucar  Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 25,   Downloads (12 Months): 255,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1281192.1281290
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Interaction graphs are ubiquitous in many fields such as bioinformatics, sociology and physical sciences. There have been many studies in the literature targeted at studying and mining these graphs. However, almost all of them have studied these graphs from a static point of view. The study of the evolution of these graphs over time can provide tremendous insight on the behavior of entities, communities and the flow of information among them. In this work, we present an event-based characterization of critical behavioral patterns for temporally varying interaction graphs. We use non-overlapping snapshots of interaction graphs and develop a framework for capturing and identifying interesting events from them. We use these events to characterize complex behavioral patterns of individuals and communities over time. We demonstrate the application of behavioral patterns for the purposes of modeling evolution, link prediction and influence maximization. Finally, we present a diffusion model for evolving networks, based on our framework.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
S. Asur, S. Parthasarathy, and D. Ucar. An event-based framework for characterizing the evolutionf interaction graphs. Technical Report Oct 2006, Updated Jun 2007, OSU-CISRC-2/07-TR16., 2007.
3
 
4
A. L. Barabasi and E. Bonabeau. Scale-free networks. Scientific American, 288:60--69, 2003.
 
5
A. L. Barabasi, H. Jeong, R. Ravasz, Z. Nda, T. Vicsek, and A. Schubert. On the topology of the scientific collaboration networks. Physica A, 311:590--614, 2002.
6
 
7
A. Clauset, M. E. J. Newman, and C. Moore. Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E, 70, 2004.
 
8
R. Cowan and N. Jonard. Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28:1557--1575, 2004.
 
9
 
10
 
11
M. Girvan and M. E. J. Newman. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(12):7821--7826, 2002.
12
 
13
D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos. Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social networks. Proc. Intl. Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP), 2005.
14
15
 
16
J. Lin, M. Vlachos, E. Keogh, and D. Gunopulos. Iterative incremental clustering of time series. EDBT, pages 106--122, 2004.
 
17
M. E. J. Newman. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(23):8577--8582, 2006.
 
18
J. Reichardt and S. Bornholdt. Detecting fuzzy community structures in complex networks with a potts model. Physical Review Letters, 93, 2004.
 
19
20
 
21
 
22
S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social network analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
 
23
H. Yang, S. Parthasarathy, and S. Mehta. Mining spatial object patterns in scientific data. Proc. 9th Intl. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, 2005.

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sitaram Asur: colleagues
Srinivasan Parthasarathy: colleagues
Duygu Ucar: colleagues