|
ABSTRACT
To understand how people really interact with digital TV and digital video recorder (DVR) systems, 10 people were recruited, 6 with DVRs and 4 with non-DVR digital cable or satellite TV systems. Video-recording equipment was set up in their homes to record their TV viewing. The person viewing as well as the TV content being viewed were recorded as the person watched TV. Afterwards, the recordings were reviewed and analyzed by the experimenter together with the viewer, who then described his or her behavior. The results show that overall the most common way people interacted with TV was in avoiding advertisements and finding new programming to watch when the current show ended. These results can be used to find ways to improve how users experience TV systems.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
BERNOFF, J. 2004. The Mind of the DVR User: Media and Advertising. Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA.
|
| |
2
|
CHOATE, J. 2003. The DVR Monitor Wave IV. C Cubed, LLC.
|
| |
3
|
CORNWELL, N.C., EVERETT, S., EVERETT, S.E., MORIARTY, S., RUSSOMANNO, J.A., TRACEY, M., AND TRAGER, T. 1993. Determining RCD use: Methodology matters. In, The Remote Control Device in the New Age of Television, J. Walker and R. Bellamy, Jr. (eds.), Praeger, New York, 43-56.
|
| |
4
|
EASTMAN, S. T. AND NEWTON, G. D. 1995. Delineating grazing: Observations of remote control use. J. Communication 4,1,77-95.
|
| |
5
|
LEE, B. AND LEE, R.S. 1995. How and why people watch TV: Implications for the future of interactive television. J. Advertising Research 35, 6, 9-18.
|
| |
6
|
MICROSOFT. 2005. Making technology conform to peoples' lives. http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2005/apr05/04-04Ethnographer.mspx. Retrieved Nov. 29.
|
| |
7
|
NIELSEN MEDIA. 2005. What TV ratings really mean (and other frequently-asked questions). http://www.nielsenmedia.com/whatratingsmean/. Retrieved Nov. 29.
|
| |
8
|
NORMAN, D.A. 2003. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York.
|
| |
9
|
RITSON, M. 2003. Creative business: Talking, reading, tasking. Financial Times (Feb. 4).
|
| |
10
|
ROBERTS, J. L. 2005. Play it again, TiVo. Newsweek. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10073890/site/newsweek/. Retrieved Nov. 29.
|
| |
11
|
RUZEK, P. 2004. Ignoring TV ads is the norm, research shows. Marketing Update. http://www.ami.org.au/AMIMU/04Oct/0410_advertising_webcast5.htm. Retrieved Feb. 17, 2006.
|
| |
12
|
TV DIMENSIONS. 2006. In-Pod Commercial Positioning. Media Dynamics, New York, p. 335.
|
CITED BY 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hyowon Lee , Paul Ferguson , Cathal Gurrin , Alan F. Smeaton , Noel E. O'Connor , Heeseon Park, Balancing the power of multimedia information retrieval and usability in designing interactive tv, Proceeding of the 1st international conference on Designing interactive user experiences for TV and video, October 22-24, 2008, Silicon Valley, California, USA
|
|
|
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.1
MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
H.1.2
User/Machine Systems
Subjects:
Human factors
Additional Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.1
Multimedia Information Systems
Subjects:
Video (e.g., tape, disk, DVI)
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
Subjects:
User-centered design;
Interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation)
J.
Computer Applications
J.7
COMPUTERS IN OTHER SYSTEMS
Subjects:
Consumer products
General Terms:
Design,
Human Factors
Keywords:
digital TV,
digital video recorder,
ethnographic studies,
people interacting with DVRs,
people interacting with TV
|